Smart Card Versus Authenticator App

 

 

Discussion: Smart Card versus Authenticator AppThe Personal Identity Verification (PIV) card is used in non-military government agencies for authentication and identification to gain access to systems, networks, and online resources. These cards, in combination with a personal identification number, meet two-factor requirements. PIV credentials also are designed to help reduce counterfeiting and are tamper-resistant.An authenticator app, such as Google Authenticator, is another method to achieve two-factor authentication. It is a free app available for installation on mobile devices.The U.S. federal government authorizes the use of PIVs as well as authenticator apps, depending on the circumstances.Answer the following question(s):

In what type of situation would an authenticator app provide adequate two-factor authentication for federal government use? Provide rationale or a citation for your answer.
In what type of situation would a PIV be required for federal government use? Provide rationale or a citation for your answer.

Sample Solution

An age-old question that continues its relevancy today is whether or not material possessions contribute to individual happiness. Many conclude that acquiring and owning material possessions will not bring true joy, however, it is evident that modern society places great value on material items, much more so than in the past. While it is true that material possessions are not essential to happiness, or provide a genuine meaning in life, there is something that can be said about owning property. It can be argued the happiness that possessions provide, while it may be momentary, is still considered happiness. However, many criticize the investment in luxuries as many believe indulgent purchases merely provide fleeting satisfaction. Yet, it remains unclear whether material possessions such as wealth, technology, or private property within society today are seen as a luxury, or rather as part of the necessity for daily living. Many strive to work better jobs for a higher paying salary in order to afford possessions of material wealth disguised as what some would consider a “good quality of life”. Overall, this paper will argue the position that although many believe material possessions are not essential to happiness, human nature compels individuals to continue to strive for more than what they currently possess or need. To better understand why modern society holds material possessions at such a high standard, it is important to compare and contrast the views of philosophers such as John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau along with their thoughts on human nature.

According to John Locke, human nature allows individuals to be selfish. In a state of nature, all people are equal and independent, and natural law allows human beings the right to defend their own “life, health, liberty, or possessions” (Locke, 1690, p. 107). It is important to note how Thomas Jefferson later replaced “possessions” with “the pursuit of happiness”, inferring that property ownership equates individual contentment. The most important source for understanding Locke’s justification for individual entitlement to private property and possessions is Chapter V of The Second Treatise of Government, “Of Property”. Locke begins with the idea that each individual possesses ownership of their own body, and all labour performed wi

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.