SOCIAL MEDIA POLICY

 

 

Developing a Personal Social Media Policy and understanding Technology Standards and Ethics
Social workers are quickly discovering that a social media policies and technology policies reflecting current ethical standards can simultaneously protect clients and practitioners. A carefully constructed social media policy and technology policies that social workers share with their clients can prevent confusion and minimize the likelihood of ethics-related problems concerning boundaries, dual relationships, informed consent, confidentiality, privacy, and documentation. Ideally, a comprehensive social media ethics policy should address the most common forms of electronic communication used by clients and social workers: social networking sites, search engines, e-mail and text messages, location-based services, and consumer review sites (shared by Dr. Frederic Reamer):
Instructions:
This assignment has two parts:
(1) Social Media Policy: Reflect on the questions and then use the following outline to develop a professional social media policy statement on each item below (1-2 paragraphs). You can use parts of the example provided as long as you cite; (2) briefly reflect on what ethical considerations influenced this policy (eg: Not accepting a client’s friend request is to protect the boundary of the professional relationship). This can be a few brief sentences. The purpose is for you to link the policy to social work ethics; and (3)the last part is a brief reflection on your professional thoughts regarding social media/technology.
• Social networking sites:
Friending” on Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram, Snapchat, etc.
o Boundaries issues
o Rejection issues
o Privacy issues (e.g., acquaintances in common)
o Dual Relationships
o Personal Disclosure

• Search engines:
To Google or not to Google
o “Curiosity” searches
o Crisis searches

• E-mail and text messaging:
• Electronic interactions
o Privacy issues
o Documentation issues
• Is the email communication for administrative or therapeutic purposes?
• How often must I check my email messages? (provide clients with written and verbal information about your policy)
• Does email communication fall under HIPAA?
• What are the confidentiality and privacy issues?
• Do I need to document emails in the clinical record?
• Office hours and outside of office hour parameters?
• Should you have a separate personal email to keep business and work issues separate?
• Location-based services:
o Are clients aware of the privacy risks in regards to apps such as , Foursquare, Gowalla, Loopt when attending agency services
• Consumer review sites:
o How to avoid challenges related to public disclosures eg; Business review sites (e.g., Yelp, Healthgrades)
• Briefly summarize your professional thoughts and concerns regarding social media and social work practice (1-2 paragraphs) and how this assignment will impact your practice.
(2) SW Technology Standards: Reflect on the questions and provide response to the questions provided (this can be a few brief sentences). The purpose is to provide knowledge and skills of SW technology standards and how this will impact policies and standards of care.
• How do you think telehealth will impact your practice of social work?
• Have you had an opportunity to engage in telehealth in your field placement experience? If so, discuss your experience (ensuring all confidentiality standards)?
• What do you think are the key concerns to consider when deciding to provide telehealth services?
• What do you anticipate will be the greatest challenge for you in using technology in SW practice?
• What do you anticipate will be the greatest benefits in suing technology in SW practice?

 

Sample Solution

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.