Social work profession in the U.S

 

What: What are your thoughts on the fact that the social work profession in the U.S. has been deemed to begin with COS, Jane Addams, and the Settlement Houses and not with Black mutual aid groups and, similarly, how they are left out of the roots of mutual aid (and social work)?
• So what: Why is it important for any community, or field of study/practice, to know its historical roots? How do the origins/roots of a thing impact its trajectory, where it goes, what it does, and its impact?
• Now what: How might social work and group work be different if we rooted our history (in this country) in the work of Black mutual aid groups? How can knowing the root of mutual aid inform the practice of the process of mutual aid in the groups we facilitate?

 

Sample Solution

The fact that the social work profession in the U.S. is credited to COS, Jane Addams, and Settlement Houses instead of Black mutual aid groups is concerning due to its erasure of the important contributions made by African Americans in the development of this field. This neglect is reflective of a larger pattern wherein people of color are not given adequate credit or recognition for their involvement and achievements in history (Radford et al., 2020).

It is also concerning that Black mutual aid groups are left out from discussions about mutual aid, which has become increasingly popularized as a way for communities to provide care and assistance during times of crisis (Kyckelhahn & Guardado-Maguire, 2021). Mutual aid existed long before it was popularized as an ideology; yet there has been little acknowledgement — even among social workers —of how these practices have been used by many marginalized communities throughout history including people of color (Specht et al., 2018). This lack of recognition further perpetuates systemic racism and oppression within society.

Therefore, it is important for social workers to recognize the roots and evolution of the profession. Acknowledging both white pioneers such as Addams along with overlooked Black activists can help ensure our understanding remains historically accurate while providing necessary respect for all individuals who helped shape our current system into what it is today. Additionally, recognizing these contributions will allow us to better appreciate how mutual aid has evolved over time and continue utilizing these strategies today.

This paper explores the likenesses and contrasts in the purposes of wistfulness inside film, design and its impact on brands. Concentrating on brands consistent impact from wistfulness, with “Brands have started entering into the nostalgic yearning clients have, perceiving ‘the worth of sentimentality in publicizing, as an approach to persuading clients to leave behind their well deserved cash” (Harvey 2017). Using wistfulness brands make a feeling of dependability and solace in their items. Thusly impacting the client to put resources into the brand. Ongoing examinations have proposed buyers buy the items to acquire a prompt return in the delight of the memory it gives. (Harvey 2017). This has thusly made brands notice that sentimentality in promoting assists construct a relationship with the client. Moreover, the impact of film on design will be investigated, “film and style have consistently had a synergetic relationship, both utilizing the innovation of the camera and that of the body and execution. Outfit is necessary both to the entertainer’s exhibition and to the entire artistic version of visual accounts and experience.”(Paulicelli, Drake ,Wallenberg p8 2017)) The utilization of ensemble inside film portrays the story, accordingly showing how significant design and apparel is inside film. Style and film depend on one another, with film advancing various patterns and assisting with restoring past designs. This should be visible with Programs, for example, Lunatics which has caused an enormous move in the craving for the 1960s style. Style and film both use sentimentality to draw in the client or crowd, the utilization of dress to recount a story should be visible inside the film the Stepford Spouses, with the functioning solid disapproved of housewives first showing up in ‘innocent’ clothing, then, at that point, changing into ladylike housewives with motivation from Dior’s New Look present. The ‘dramatic show ‘made on the catwalk will likewise be analyzed, concentrating on originators like Orla Kiely and Chanel, changing the catwalk into grocery stores showing areas of strength for the among design and the impact of film, for example, The Stepford Spouses. Through concentrating on both design and movies utilization of wistfulness, the sentimentality for the homegrown housewife is clear. This always present housewife should be visible all through “well known promoting and style symbolism: the natural 1940s or 1950s “classic” lady or housewife,” (Bibby L) Addressing assuming that the freedom and progress of females place in the public arena is being appeared through design and film. Besides, looking at the purposes of the 1950s housewife inside style and on the off chance that this is impeding to the advancement of ladies’ portrayal in design and film. Originators, for example, Orla Kiely and her motivation for the homegrown stylish assortments are investigated, As expressed to the Design Transmit “My motivation has forever been midcentury. I love the manner in which the ladies dress in all the Kitchen Sink shows, and movies like Rosemary’s Child and Shoeless in the Recreation area,” she told fashion.telegraph.co.uk (TYZACK 2013). This not just backings the explanation that sentimentality si a wellspring of motivation for originators yet additionally film, drawing motivation from the 1950s and 1960s ensembles fe

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.