Societal Changes

 

A recent event has caused uproar in demands for law enforcement to be attentive to activities that could lead to terrorism or gang activity. Race has been a source of controversy because of the stereotypes and labels put on individuals from certain races and religious backgrounds.

Opinions about issues in society are often the catalyst for the foundations of social change. The combined opinions of all individuals determine society’s position on an issue. Because criminal justice professionals have a first-hand view of the individuals who will be affected by the change, it is particularly crucial that they develop and advocate a position on an issue.

Using the library, Internet, or any other available materials for adequate, accurate, and relevant support, address your position on this controversial issue.
Propose 2 strategies for dealing with law enforcement subculture and racial profiling.
One strategy is to be from an ethical perspective and the other should be in terms of keeping societal opinion from making significant changes in the functioning of systems and society as a whole.

Sample Solution

My position on this controversial issue is that law enforcement should be attentive to both criminal activity and racial profiling. Racial profiling undermines the legitimacy of our justice system, and can erode public trust in law enforcement. There are two strategies that I believe can help address the issue of law enforcement subculture and racial profiling: education and training, as well as community engagement.

Firstly, providing comprehensive education and training to all police officers is essential for addressing the problem of racial profiling. This could include teaching officers how they can investigate potential crimes while being aware of their cultural biases (Exum 2020). For instance, by understanding different cultures’ attitudes towards authority figures, or recognizing that members from certain ethnic backgrounds may have had negative experiences with the police in the past due to over-policing in certain areas (The Leadership Conference Education Fund 2017). Secondly, engaging with communities on a regular basis is also important for reducing tensions between police forces and racialized people. This includes interacting with individuals from different backgrounds through face-to-face meetings or creating community outreach programs such as “Coffee with a Cop” (Miller 2019). These initiatives create an avenue for dialogue between citizens and law enforcement personnel to discuss incidents related to racism or bias (Razack 2018), which ultimately helps build mutual respect between them.

In conclusion, it is vital that we take action against racial profiling because it has severe consequences on society’s sense of safety and security. Education combined with meaningful communication are key components necessary for tackling this problem effectively; only then will we begin seeing lasting change within our criminal justice system.

n reaction to the emergency, the world czars have been utilizing a combination of promulgation, concealment of political opponents, and development of political powers. As a familiar proverb goes, “Never let a decent starvation go to squander”, numerous pioneers have been effective in their power snatches. Pandemic has empowered the world chiefs to legitimize the utilization of leader powers, keep individuals, and encroach on the opportunities of articulation. Hungary has passed another regulation that awards its State head Victor Orban the ability to suspend the nation’s current regulations. An endless Highly sensitive situation has been proclaimed in Hungary, shortening the opportunity of articulation and punishing those breaking quarantine orders. Philippines council has conceded President Rodrigo Duterte with crisis powers. What’s more, the President has forced show no mercy orders of those not following the quarantine standards. In Egypt, compound fighting soldiers, clad in defensive suit have been conveyed to clean suburbia. Pandemic has offered a chance for the majority rule state run administrations to boycott public gatherings, quarantine, close lines, limit exchange, force limitations on development, and blue pencil media. History likewise proposes that after an emergency, the state doesn’t abandon all the ground it had gotten. In this manner, it is basic to guess the sort of state we would live in after the emergency.

There has likewise been an ascent during the time spent ‘othering’ with the flare-up of Coronavirus pandemic. Rather than making a move to embrace and support each other, the country states have turned into the center point of xenophobia. Indeed, even as the Covid spread across the globe, reports of bigotry towards East Asians have been on the ascent in the Western majority rule governments. The Leader of US, Donald Trump, has over and over alluded to the Covid as ‘Chinese Infection’. Xenophobia has turned into a negligible instrument for states and their residents to variety reactions as for the pandemic. Media likewise assumes a significant part in the making of ‘the other’, as a differentiation to oneself. Xenophobia deliberately empowers the social disgrace towards others in the public eye. The second a pandemic is regionalised and slandered, mankind will experience a miserable end.

Researchers across the globe have given their decision on a post-pandemic world, with many insisting that the “world will be less open, prosperous, and free”. A few researchers accept that China would ascend as another worldwide power; and some others have composed an eulogy to hyper-globalization. Environmental change, for good, will acquire spotlight in a post-pandemic world. It is fascinating to perceive how emergency itself works out over the timeframe to give a certifiable response. One of the relevant ends that could be attracted with reaction to pandemic is the ineptness of the multitude of Legislatures to deal with an emergency of this size.

A pandemic-State will constantly be soiled by the ascent of dictatorship, reconnaissance, and xenophobia. Be that as it may, such a State won’t be reasonable for a post-emergency time. We want to hold in line the force of States in a post-pandemic culture. Joined Countries, as an organization, has neglected to give an aggregate worldwide reaction. Its downfall appear to be clear, like never before. It shouldn’t mean an end to ‘worldwide administration’. We want establishments with vigorous and organized type of worldwide administration instruments. A world government with organized power-imparting to country states would be a refined option for the human culture. Such an administration would require enforceable purview on issues that compromise humankind,

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.