Somebody’s money and wealth

at
Categories
Tags

 

 

Some people argue that happiness is directly correlated with somebody’s money and wealth. They say that the more money you have, the happier you feel.They say that “by purchasing what you like,” you can acquire happiness. However, your task is to argue that money in itself cannot make you happy. When presenting your argument, you must incorporate the points of the assignment we have read in “Happiness” assignment. Also, you are allowed use your own knowledge and experience to back up your argument. But you are not allowed to use any other secondary sources. You should follow APA parenthetical citation whenever you want to cite any sentences from the “Happiness” assignment. Let’s pretend that the author of this assignment is Martin Smith. The page numbers are 146-48. Remember that you are arguing that money cannot make you happy. Your assignment needs to be 600–650 words long. (Remember that you need to concede the opposition party’s argument and do not forget about the refutation).

 

 

Sample Solution

They say that the more money you have, the happier you feel. However, money in itself cannot make you happy. Money is fleeting. If money equaled happiness, lottery winners would be the happiest people on the planet. You may think that once you reach that “target” financial goal, you will feel like you have made it. Wrong. Instead, you want more. It is never enough. That is because having money as a goal won’t fill you up, because money isn’t a destination. It is a tool. You look at wealthy people and think, I wish I were them. They must lead such amazing lives. But if you think money will give you confidence or make you feel more complete, think again.

g leader-member relations, if the group are familiar and trusting of the leader policy implementation becomes much simpler. Similarly to leadership, understanding and adapting to the situation is key to a leader being able to implement policies that ensure a group work as a team. Teamwork is a product of good leadership, and is again the responsibility of the leader to ensure the group are working successfully together. Highly functioning teams are essential within organisations to increase productivity and member satisfaction, by utilising the talents of all group members effectively within the constraints of the task, personal relationships and the group goals (Pettinger, 2007).
Figure 2: Tuckman’s Model of Group Development (Agile Scrum Guide, 2019)
Tuckman in his Model of Group Development provides easily identifiable stages that a groups performance can be measured against, making it useful for monitoring performance, Figure 2 shows Tuckman’s model. Ranking group performance against this scale can provide leaders with a clear understanding of how the group are functioning, allowing them to implement policies to change this if performance is unsatisfactory (Pettinger, 2007). Within organisations, the theory can be loosely applied to creating teams by grouping familiar individuals with the aim that they will reach the norming and performing stage of the model quicker. For short and simple tasks this is an extremely effective way of organising groups, due to the increased short term productivity. However there are significant issues with grouping individuals in this manner, particularly when tasks become more complex, and ultimately the model should mainly be use

This question has been answered.

Get Answer