Question 1: Provide an overview of the Spies model and touch on Domestic and Foreign Spies.

The Spies model is a way of understanding the relationship between the church and the world. It sees the world as a hostile environment, full of spies who are trying to infiltrate the church and undermine its faith. These spies can be either domestic or foreign.

• Domestic spies are people who are already inside the church, but who are secretly working to undermine it. They may be people who have been influenced by modernism or secularism, or they may be people who are simply seeking power or influence.
• Foreign spies are people who are not part of the church, but who are trying to infiltrate it from the outside. They may be people who are working for other religions, or they may be people who are simply trying to sow discord and division.

The Spies model sees the church as being under constant attack from the world, and it calls on Christians to be vigilant and to be on guard against these spies.

Question 2: Provide an overview of the Enemies model and touch on secular combatants and Christian combatants.

The Enemies model is another way of understanding the relationship between the church and the world. It sees the world as being in a state of war with the church, and it calls on Christians to be prepared to fight.

• Secular combatants are people who are not part of the church, but who are actively hostile to it. They may be people who are working for other religions, or they may be people who are simply opposed to Christianity.
• Christian combatants are Christians who are willing to fight for the church. They may be people who are involved in apologetics or evangelism, or they may be people who are willing to take a stand against secularism or other forms of opposition to the church.

The Enemies model sees the church as being in a battle with the world, and it calls on Christians to be prepared to fight for their faith.

Question 3: According to Johnson, what is the difference between early and late modernism?

Early modernism was a movement that began in the 19th century and that emphasized the importance of reason and science. It saw the world as being a rational and orderly place, and it believed that it could be understood through the use of reason and science.

Late modernism, on the other hand, began in the 20th century and that emphasized the importance of experience and emotion. It saw the world as being a complex and ambiguous place, and it believed that it could only be understood through the use of experience and emotion.

Johnson argues that late modernism has led to a crisis in the church because it has undermined the church’s traditional beliefs and values. He argues that the church needs to return to its roots in early modernism and to re-emphasize the importance of reason and science.

Question 4: According to Entwistle, what is “All truth is God’s truth” referring to? Expand on this concept.

The phrase “All truth is God’s truth” is a way of saying that all truth comes from God. It means that there is no such thing as a truth that is separate from God.

This concept is based on the belief that God is the creator of the universe and that he is the source of all knowledge. It also means that God is the ultimate arbiter of truth.

The concept of “All truth is God’s truth” has a number of implications for the church. It means that the church should be open to all truth, regardless of its source. It also means that the church should be willing to challenge false truth claims.

Question 5: Found in the Johnson text, expound upon what is causing the Church’s crisis with psychology.

Johnson argues that the church’s crisis with psychology is caused by a number of factors, including:

• The rise of secular psychology, which has led to the erosion of the church’s authority in the area of human behavior.
• The failure of the church to adequately address the challenges of modern life, such as anxiety and depression.
• The church’s own internal divisions, which have made it difficult for it to speak with a unified voice on the issue of psychology.

Johnson argues that the church needs to address these challenges if it is to regain its authority in the area of human behavior. He argues that the church needs to develop its own Christian psychology, which is based on the Bible and on the church’s tradition.