Standard PERT estimating formula

 

Apply the standard PERT estimating formula and calculate the expected estimate (Te) for each activity. Explain the purpose behind the PERT calculations. PERT estimate calculations and your explanation of them should be between 550–700 words.

Sample Solution

The Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) is a method used to calculate project duration estimates. It is based on the assumption that tasks are subject to uncertainty, and so it accounts for this by estimating three values – Optimistic Time (To), Most Likely or Expected Time (Te), and Pessimistic Time (Tp). The expected time of an activity can then be calculated using the following formula: Te = (To+ 4Tm + Tp)/6.

For example, if a task has an optimistic time estimate of 5 days, most likely time estimate of 10 days and a pessimistic time estimate of 15 days, then its expected duration would be calculated as follows: Te = (5 + 4(10) + 15)/6 = 11.7 Days.

The purpose behind these calculations is to provide more accurate project duration estimates than traditional methods such as Critical Path Method which do not account for uncertainty. By calculating the optimistic, most likely and pessimistic values for each task in a project timeline , one can take into account potential delays due to unknown factors such as resource availability . This in turn allows managers to plan their projects better by providing them with realistic expectations about how long each task will take . Additionally , it also provides them with an estimated range within which they should expect the activity’s completion – i.e between To and Tp – allowing them to plan accordingly in case there are any delays beyond this period.

In conclusion , PERT estimation helps managers get more accurate duration estimates compared to traditional methods while also accounting for any uncertainties or external factors that might cause delays in completing the tasks . Hence it is an invaluable tool when planning complex projects whose timelines contain multiple activities

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pieces of data that can be put away in prompt (present moment) memory, how much data inside every one of those lumps can be very high, without unfavorably influencing the review of similar number

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.