For your case study, write out the question and thoroughly respond using APA formatting (example: in-text citations, double spacing, etc.). You do not need a cover sheet, running head, or an abstract, but you are required to have a separate “Works Cited” page. Generally, a quality case study is approximately three pages or about 3/4 of a page double spaced for each response. This does not including the “Works Cited” page. Your responses should be supported by at least one primary or secondary source per question.
My expectation is that your responses will be succinct, and that they will be supported by both key facts from the case study and from your source data. In reading your responses, it should be clear to me that you have read the entire case study, and haven’t tried to respond by “cherry picking” information that only pertains to the question. If anything, your issue is not going to be that you don’t have enough information to respond to the question. Instead, it will be keeping your response succinct. Please review the section in the syllabus on acceptable source data before beginning.
Your responses should also address the following three questions:
What is the main issue?
Who are the primary stakeholders?
What did the company do? Is there anything else they could have done to address their issue?
Sometimes the issues aren’t so obvious. For example, in the Starbucks case study, the company is concerned with expanding their brand in a socially responsible manner. To do so, they needed to address the needs of their primary stakeholders. Who are they and what actions did Starbucks take? Lastly, evaluate what Starbucks did to expand their brand in a socially responsible manner. Were they successful? Is there anything else they could have done? These responses should be incorporated in to your response questions.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) developed the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) Advanced model to test bundled payments for 32 specific episodes and to incentivize participating providers for decreasing care costs and improving care quality for Medicare patients receiving care for one of these 32 clinical episodes.1 This model is entirely voluntary, consists of a single retrospective bundled payment with a 90-day clinical episode duration, and places more risk onto the providers than previous BPCI models.1
There are seven quality measures for BPCI Advanced, including all-cause hospital readmissions, advance care plan, and CMS patient safety indicators that are used to measure the quality of care and reimbursement level for each episode.1 To identify reimbursement level, CMS compares the aggregate Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) expenditures included in a clinical episode against the episode’s target price to determine whether the participant will either receive a payment or be required to pay CMS. If the provider keeps costs below the target price for each episode, financial savings will be generated through this value-based payment (VBP) model, in addition to the improvement in the quality and continuity of care for Medicare patients. At this time, BPCI Advanced results are not yet available in order to determine the extent of the gains/losses realized in this VBP model.2
Implementation of BPCI Advanced for providers that have used past BPCI models, particularly BPCI Model 3, would be less challenging than for providers who have not, due to preestablished networks and pathways for continuity of care for some clinical episodes as well as familiarity with the program.2 In addition, many providers will be interested in participating, as BPCI Advanced qualifies as an Advanced Alternative Payment Model (APM) and thus exempts participants from payment reductions under MACRA.3 BPCI Advanced is also a voluntary payment model and will see less opposition than mandatory mo