Steps to manage change.

at
Categories
Tags

Description

Discuss the steps to manage change.

Achieve goals through planning and prioritization.

The Module 3 assignment involves a review of how resistance to change can be effectively managed within an organization. A company’s competitive advantage relies on its ability to quickly adapt to changes in both the internal and external environments. Managers that are adept at guiding the change process will have the ability to shape the organizational strategy overall. However, change is often difficult for individuals, so a keen understanding of techniques available to manage resistance is necessary for any manager.

Using the material from Chapter 15 of the text as well as your own independent research, you will develop a plan to manage resistance to change based on the scenario below.

Scenario:

You have been called in as a consultant to PG Industries (a fictitious company). The new VP of Manufacturing, Laine Thomas, has performed a review of her department and made recommendations to staff about introducing a new training program. The program has been rolled out, but senior management is struggling to get buy-in from many long-term employees. This resistance to acceptance and adoption of the new training program is causing division within the department.

Assignment Checklist:

Review Exhibit 15.6 from your textbook.
Based on the information provided in this scenario, draft a persuasive essay that identifies what you believe will be the four most effective ways one might manage resistance to change in implementing the new training program.
Justify your choice of each tactic by explaining how it is most appropriate in this circumstance.

Utilize at least two external sources as part of your research. Sources might include your textbook, the additional video content, or another resource found in the university library.

Minimum Submission Requirements

The assessment should be submitted as a Microsoft Word document (.doc or .docx).
Your submission should include a title page, introduction, main body, conclusion, and reference list.
The assessment should be double-spaced, 12-point font, and no less than 500 words, not including title page and reference list.
Respond to the questions in a thorough manner, providing specific examples of concepts, topics, definitions, and other elements asked for in the questions. Your paper should be highly organized, logical, and focused.
Your paper must be written in Standard English and demonstrate exceptional content, organization, style, and grammar and mechanics.
Your paper should provide a clearly established and sustained viewpoint and purpose.
Your writing should be well ordered, logical, and unified, as well as original and insightful.
Be sure to cite both in-text and reference list citations where appropriate and reference all sources. Your sources and content should follow proper APA citation style. Review the Writing Center resources on APA style and formatting available in the Academic Success Center found in the Academic Tools area in your course.

Sample Solution

Be that as it may, backers of SRI guarantee that it bodes well to follow feasible venture methodology to produce unrivaled returns. They drill down a few points of interest which socially capable firms have over different firms which make them monetarily more grounded and progressively beneficial. Socially capable firms are more averse to confront natural fines; they are less inclined to confront exorbitant settlements coming about because of risk claims for awful quality items; great corporate citizenship may bring about expanded item deals; and worker steadfastness coming about because of good representative relationship will help improve efficiency, development and along these lines benefit. [2]

Alexander Kempf and Peer Osthoff in their paper “The Effect of Socially Responsible Investing On Portfolio Performance” [1] utilized SRI evaluations of KLD Research and Analytics to frame two stock portfolios, one with stocks having high SRI appraisals and the other with low SRI appraisals. They contemplated the presentation of these portfolios from 1992-2004 and discovered that high-appraised portfolio created better yields when contrasted with the low-evaluated portfolio. They reasoned that the examinations which looked at and demonstrated lower execution of socially capable shared assets neglect to represent the way that the exhibition of common assets depend to a huge degree on the aptitudes of the shared store director and along these lines the aftereffects of these investigations may not mirror the genuine image of socially capable ventures. David A. Sauer in his paper ‘The Impact of Social-Responsibility Screens on Investment Performance’ [2] thought about the exhibition of a socially capable portfolio with two unhindered portfolio without considering the impacts of exchange costs, the board charges , and so forth on portfolio execution to all the more straightforwardly inspect the ramifications of confined social contributing on portfolio returns. His discoveries showed that the social dependable screenings don’t really adversy affect inve

This question has been answered.

Get Answer