Strategic Planning for Environmental Health—Part 2

 

A. Analysis of Intervention Strategies. Based upon your Human Health Risk Assessment and using the Strategic Planning for Environmental Health template (“Analysis of Intervention Strategies” section), please recommend two (2) intervention strategies for mitigating the challenges presented by your chosen environmental chemical hazard by providing a summary of each strategy at the top of each table. [PHE-540-05]. The intervention may consist of various approaches, such as policy/advocacy strategies, health promotion strategies, etc. The strategies that you select should align with your chosen environmental chemical hazard, while also being well-supported by the literature. Analyze each intervention strategy by responding to the following prompts:
• Identify the public health theory/concept/approach/model/framework/etc. that was used for this strategy.
• Summarize this public health theory/concept/approach/model/framework/etc.
• Explain the rationale for using this theory/concept/approach/model/framework/etc.
• Explain how this intervention serves as a proactive solution to the health problem(s) caused by the chemical hazard. Place your responses to these questions within the tables provided in the template.
B. Risk Management and Communication Approaches. Using the table provided in the “Risk Management and Communication Approaches” section of the Strategic Planning for Environmental Health Template, you will explain how you would use risk management and communication approaches (see the EPA’s Risk Management https://www.epa.gov/risk/risk-management. and Risk Communication https://www.epa.gov/risk/risk-communication. approaches webpages) while implementing the intervention strategies from the Strategic Planning for Environmental Health Template. This analysis involves several factors, which may be abbreviated in the acronym “PESTLE,” which stands for:
• Political Factors: Interactions among international, federal, state, and local government entities; Practices defined by agency policy and political administrations; Activities of Congress, special interest groups, or concerned citizens
• Economic Factors: The costs of risk mitigation or remediation options and the distributional effects
• Social Factors: Factors that affect the susceptibility of an individual or a definable group to risks from a particular stressor—such as income level, ethnic background, community values, land use, zoning, availability of health care, lifestyle, and psychological condition
• Technological Factors: The feasibility, impacts, and range of risk management options
• Legal Factors: Factors that define the basis for the agency’s risk assessments, management decisions, and, in some instances, the schedule, level, or methods for risk reduction
• Environmental Factors: Provide the basis for the risk assessment, including information drawn from toxicology, chemistry, epidemiology, ecology, and statistics—to name a few.
Specifically, within the template, respond to the two questions below. (Tip: Look at the column headings.)
• Management Approaches: Describe the issues that are pertinent to the management of your chosen intervention strategies for each PESTLE factor.
• Communication Approaches: Explain how each PESTLE factor would affect communications during the implementation of your chosen intervention strategies.
Please provide at least one (1) example for each cell of PESTLE in the template. Be sure to see this PESTLE example: PESTLE Chart
C. Environmental Justice and Equity. In the second part of the table, you will continue to analyze these approaches by analyzing how both management and communication approaches would integrate the tenets of environmental justice and equity, including (1) fair treatment and (2) meaningful involvement of all people—as defined by the EPA (see the EPA’s Learn About Environmental Justice page https://www.epa.gov/environmentaljustice/learn-about-environmental-justice. ).
Specifically: respond to the two questions below:
• Management Approaches: Explain what should be consider for each tenet of environmental justice (fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people) in managing your chosen strategies.
• Communication Approaches: Explain how each tenet (fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people) would affect communications during the implementation of your chosen intervention strategies.

 

 

 

 

Sample Solution

experienced labour shortages. Nattrass (1996:46; 2001) notes that in response to this challenge the South African government used coercive measures to ensure cheap labour to meet the demands of industry, mines, and commercial farms. Development driven by gold revenues and foreign capital ensured a consistent flow of labour away from traditional agriculture in favour of rapid urbanization (Nattrass 1996:46; Stander 1996). But this growth ground to a halt in the mid-1970s when the gold boom burst and effectively lost its luster. By the late 1970s unemployment had taken hold such that by 1994, one third of the African labour force was simply unable to find work. From the mid-1920s South Africa’s industrialisation strategy mirrored that of Latin America with a strong inward focus. Initially, this strategy supported labour-intensive industries but slowly began losing steam by the 1960s. Unlike the East Asian economies, who at that time adopted a more outward-orientated export approach, South Africa closed in with heavier protectionist measures and a capital-intensive industry approach. These developments, together with negative real interest rates and large-scale strategic investments such as Sasol, made for a lethal concoction of rising capital intensity. The net result is that economy became increasingly more capital intensive at the expense of labour intensity. The issue of employment creation is a hotly contested one in South African politics. Twenty years after democracy, it is still the election-dominating card, and the priority of national, provincial and municipal card. In fact, amongst the biggest and most visible political parties, the promise to create jobs is at the top of their election manifestos. ‘We have created 3.7million work opportunities over the past 5years’ ‘ Zuma, State of the Nation 2014 ‘The manifest we release today is a manifesto for jobs’ ‘ Helen Zille, Leader of opposition Democratic Alliance. Without getting into the political semantics it is important to heed Bhora’s (2003) cautions that we must understand the absolute expansion of employment within context. More simply, the number of jobs that have been created must be understood against the number of new entrants that have come into the labour market over the same period. For example, between 1995 and 2002: 1.6million jobs were created. However, 5 million new entrants entered the labour market over the same period. The inability of the labour force to absorb new entrants in addition to the graduate unemploy

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.