Strategies of Survival (2): Patronage and power sharing
Geddes, Barbara, Joseph George Wright, Joseph Wright, and Erica Frantz. How dictatorships work: Power, personalization, and collapse. Cambridge University Press, 2018. Chapter 6: (“Why Parties and Elections in Dictatorships?” p. 129-153)
- Lust-Okar, Ellen. "Elections under authoritarianism: Preliminary lessons from
Jordan." Democratization 13.3 (2006): 456-471.
- Anne Meng (2020). Constraining Dictatorship: From Personalized Rule to Institutionalized Regimes. Chapter 1 (p.1-23)
you are expected to write a short reading response . You should 1) sum up the main thesis and arguments of two readings that week in 200 words; 2) make and support one point in 200 words (e.g. an evaluation and critique of one article, argument, or concept, a connection between the readings an application/example, questions and issues left unanswered
Additionally, annulling/deprioritising execution evaluations to zero in on persistent and multi-source input, empowers administrators to give basic appraisals across the association's pecking order. This approach can be met fluctuating responses in light of the social foundations of workers.
3.3.3 Lawful issues
Execution examinations are officially recorded in the representative's document and can moderate suit risk. Independently, some HR experts are worried of a potential ascent in legitimate activities by representatives on the off chance that their association stops giving legitimacy pay increments in view of mathematical evaluations, which on a superficial level show up more unbiased than having no evaluations.
3.3.4 Prize decency
Execution examination handled and coming about rating is connected to procedural equity, as it gives the impression of an unmistakable and fair approach to connecting compensations to execution. Eliminating mathematical appraisals can make it hard to decide the new reason for remuneration. Cappelli and Tavis (2016) give a model where New York Life disposed of formal evaluations, and this brought about merit-pay increment to be shared inside and deciphered as execution scores. These prompted the issue of "shadow evaluations" and affected other HR choices, inciting the business to once again introduced proper examinations.
While certain associations have canceled/deprioritised execution evaluations, they have kept up with the exhibition related-pay model and searching for ways of deciding legitimacy pay increments by depending on criticism/subjective decisions by directors rather than a mathematical rating.
3.4 Circumstances FOR Annulling OR DEPRIORITISING
3.4.1 Organize input through compelling frameworks
To deal with the volume, assortment and recurrence of the input under the new methodology, the cycle should be regulated through successful frameworks. Especially as it assumes a greater part in deciding legitimacy pay increments and advancement. This ought to incorporate coordination with current HR frameworks as well as advancement of available versatile applications or online instruments that permit brief criticism conveyance. There is proof to propose that criticism is bound to be looked for electronically than face to face (Kluger and Adler, 1993).
To develop of the input ought to be basic, organized and revolved around objecti
Sample Solution
The main thesis of Geddes, Wright and Frantz's book "How Dictatorships Work" is that power in authoritarian regimes is typically personalized and centered around a single individual, who maintains control through a combination of coercion, patronage, and electoral manipulation. They argue that this type of system can lead to instability and eventual collapse due to the lack of institutionalization which results from relying primarily on an individual for decision-making power. This allows for actions to be taken without proper oversight or accountability as any changes made are determined by the ruler's personal preferences.
In contrast , Ellen Lust-Okar’s article “Elections Under Authoritarianism: Preliminary Lessons From Jordan” suggest that while elections are often used by dictators as a tool for manipulating public opinion they still have some benefit in terms of introducing greater levels of political competition. She argues that elections can challenge autocratic rule if turnout levels remain high enough since this reduces the ability for rulers to make sweeping changes without risking widespread opposition .
Finally, Anne Meng’s book “Constraining Dictatorship: From Personalized Rule To Institutionalized Regimes” takes both arguments into account when looking at how these systems ultimately end up functioning. She suggests there needs to be a balance between having too much or too little control - with too much leading towards further rigidity whilst lacking it could result in chaotic situations where there is no way for citizens to properly engage with government decisions.