Structures, Controls, and Policies to Address the Ethical Challenge

 

focus is on the organization’s current structure as well as levers of control (both internal and external controls) available to you, the person in leadership or the consultant, as ethical decisions are made and implemented.

For reminders concerning the organization, the focus of the three papers required, and writing expectations, see the “General Introduction” provided for the first written assignment (Week 4).

Paper 2 Instructions

To Prepare

As in the first paper, use APA formatting.
A minimum of six peer-reviewed sources should be included. Sources used from paper one also may be used in this second paper. (Peer review sources do not include newspaper articles, websites produced by the organization you are considering, open-sourced references e.g., Wikipedia, etc.)
A title page and Reference list are to be part of this assignment, though these items are not included when considering the length of the paper.
The Assignment

Reintroduce your organization, ethical challenge you are addressing, and the philosophical principles and obligations which you have stated (in your first paper) that stakeholders must consider.
For leadership to lead an ethical organization, they must be aware of and understand how to use both internal and external controls. Discuss both types of controls that are at the disposal of your organization’s leadership, citing the Cooper text.
Identify current specific structures, controls, and/or policies essential to addressing the ethical dilemma upon which you are focused. For example, internally is there a hierarchical structure to your organization which can serve to help with decision-making? Is there a Board to which leadership is accountable? Externally, are there legal structures that (at least in theory) should ensure ethical decisions are being made (or, due to weaknesses in the structures, are these allowing unethical decisions)?
Considering what may be needed (future), what are the new internal structures, controls, and policies and/or procedures that you believe may be necessary to address the ethical challenge? How would you develop these new structures, controls, policies and/or procedures? What would be required to implement these changes? What needs to occur, external to the organization itself, to support the ethical decision (which you identified in paper #1) that is needed?

 

Sample Solution

tes, “Perhaps, indeed, there might be some people who would prefer to deny the existence of any God so powerful, rather than believing that all other things are uncertain.” In other words, there are possibly other people who would deny that there is a God than to believe that everything else in the world does not exist. Descartes believes that God?

is being and all other things are not being. All other things in the world compared to God are subordinate because God is almighty.
Another one of Descartes’ theories in Meditation One is the Evil Demon Argument. It is also worth noting that is this not Descartes own position, but uses it as an argumentative device. The Evil Demon Argument states that an evil demon has the will, power, and the knowledge to make a person a constant victim of deception. Even one is thinking something is self-evidently true, it’s not.

There is a distinction between the mind and the body. The mind is essentially thinking and the body is essentially extended so that the two have nothing in common. In Descartes’ Meditations on Philosophy, there is a character, the mediator, and he reasons that he might cast all the opinions of others into doubt if he can doubt the foundations of basic principles upon which his opinions are founded.

In the first meditation, Descartes rejects as if false any belief that is open to d

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.