I found it difficult to make confident and decisive decisions on some of the questions. There were a few questions where I felt strongly about my answer, but there were also a few questions where I felt that there was no clear right or wrong answer. In those cases, I selected mostly moderate responses.

• Did any subject areas trigger personal emotions or issues? If so, do you feel you were able to remain objective?

Yes, a few of the subject areas triggered personal emotions or issues for me. For example, the question about whether it is ever right to lie to protect someone triggered my own experiences with lying and deception. However, I felt that I was able to remain objective in my answers. I tried to think about the questions from a neutral perspective and to consider all of the possible factors involved.

• Were any of the decisions especially difficult to make?

Yes, a few of the decisions were especially difficult to make. For example, the question about whether it is ever right to break the law to do the right thing was a difficult one. I believe that it is important to obey the law, but I also believe that there are sometimes extenuating circumstances where it may be necessary to break the law. I ultimately decided that it is a case-by-case decision and that there is no easy answer.

• Did you employ any critical thinking or resolution strategies to determine a response?

Yes, I employed several critical thinking and resolution strategies to determine my responses. I first tried to identify the key issues involved in each question. Then, I considered all of the possible answers and weighed the pros and cons of each one. I also tried to think about how my answer would affect others and how it would align with my own moral values.

• Did you rely on policy or legal parameters to make your decisions?

Yes, I did rely on policy and legal parameters to make some of my decisions. For example, the question about whether it is ever right to withhold information from a patient’s doctor required me to consider the relevant laws and regulations. In some cases, the law may be clear-cut, but in other cases, there may be gray areas. In those cases, I tried to use my best judgment to make a decision that was consistent with the law and my own moral values.

• Would you be comfortable making your answers to the survey public, or do you prefer anonymity?

I would prefer to remain anonymous. I believe that it is important to be honest and open about my moral values, but I also value my privacy. I am not sure how my answers to the survey would be perceived by others, and I do not want to risk any negative consequences.

• Have you dealt with similar situations and could you perceive similar situations occurring in your clinical practice?

Yes, I have dealt with similar situations in my personal life and I could perceive similar situations occurring in my clinical practice. For example, I have had to make decisions about whether to tell the truth, even if it hurts someone’s feelings. I have also had to make decisions about whether to break the law, even if it is for a good reason. These are difficult decisions, but I believe that it is important to have a strong moral compass to guide me.

• How might a moral inventory such as this survey impact your clinical practice?

A moral inventory such as this survey could help me to reflect on my own moral values and how they might affect my clinical practice. It could also help me to identify areas where I need to improve my moral decision-making skills. I believe that it is important for clinicians to be aware of their own moral values and how they might impact their work. This awareness can help us to make better decisions and to provide better care for our patients.