Suicide Risk

 

 

While the procedures used to conduct suicide risk assessments vary by agency/school, there are important foundational processes and tools one must thoroughly understand. As someone on the front line and in direct contact with clients/students, counselors need to be able to understand and implement suicide risk assessment in an instant, without hesitation. Due to this, it is critical that counselors are aware of risk factors, suicide risk assessments tools, interventions, and safety planning on the individual level.

Present a background of suicide, including:
Identify and explain key terms associated with suicide intervention, such as suicidal ideation, suicide plan, suicide attempt, etc. Briefly address terms no longer used in the field.
Identify risk factors for suicidal behavior, with a focus on cultural aspects presented and previous mental health diagnoses.
Identify prevalence/statistics within various populations (LGBTI, males, military, American Indians/Alaska Natives, etc.).
Report on suicide risk screeners and assessment tools.
Identify the difference between a suicide risk screening and assessment.
Present several instruments used (IS PATH WARM, SAFE-T, PHQ-9, etc.).
Application to case.
Choose either the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) or Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) from the Suicide Prevention and Management Webinar and apply it to the case of Anna in Chapter 7 (page 151), reporting on what her ratings on either scale would be.
Identify the following for Anna (or David): risk factors, protective factors, lethality, plan, and mandated reporting issues.
Create a safety plan for Anna (or David) using the Emotional Fire Safety Plan

 

Sample Solution

Understanding Suicide and Applying It to Anna’s Case:

Key Terms:

  • Suicidal Ideation:Thoughts about ending one’s life, ranging from fleeting wishes to well-developed plans.
  • Suicide Plan:Specific thoughts or actions aimed at self-harm with the intent to die.
  • Suicide Attempt:An act with the intent to end one’s life, regardless of outcome.
  • No Longer Used Terms:“Committer” (replaced by “person who died by suicide”), “selfish” (judgmental and inaccurate).

Risk Factors:

  • Mental health diagnoses:Depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, substance abuse.
  • Cultural factors:Stigma, lack of access to resources, historical trauma.
  • Previous suicide attempts:Strong predictor of future attempts.
  • Hopelessness:Feeling like things will never get better.
  • Social isolation:Lack of connection and support networks.
  • Life stressors:Relationship problems, financial difficulties, bullying.

Prevalence:

  • LGBTQI+:Higher rates of suicidal ideation and attempts than general population.
  • Males:Higher suicide death rates, often due to more lethal methods.
  • Military:Increased risk due to combat stress and access to lethal means.
  • American Indians/Alaska Natives:Disproportionately high rates, linked to historical trauma and lack of resources.

Suicide Risk Screeners & Assessments:

  • Screeners:Brief tools to identify potential risk (e.g., PHQ-9, C-SSRS).
  • Assessments:In-depth evaluations to understand risk factors and develop interventions.

Instruments:

  • PHQ-9:Measures depression severity, may indicate suicidality indirectly.
  • C-SSRS:Comprehensive assessment of suicidal thoughts, plans, and intent.

Applying to Anna (Case Study):

Unfortunately, I cannot definitively apply the tools without reviewing Anna’s case study in full. However, I can provide general guidance:

  • PHQ-9:Based on Anna’s symptoms and life situation, her score could potentially indicate significant depression and possible suicidal ideation.
  • C-SSRS:Based on her thoughts, plans, and behaviors described in the case study, her score could suggest varying degrees of suicidal risk depending on the details.

Identifying Risk and Protective Factors for Anna:

  • Analyze the case study for factors listed above like mental health, social support, life stressors, and cultural influences.
  • Identify protective factors like coping mechanisms, strong relationships, and access to resources.

Lethality and Plan:

  • Assess the seriousness and specificity of Anna’s suicide plan if mentioned.
  • Consider the lethality of any potential means she might have access to.

Mandated Reporting:

  • Understand your state’s laws and ethical guidelines on mandatory reporting of potential suicide risk.
  • Consider the severity of Anna’s risk and potential harm to herself to determine reporting requirements.

Safety Plan with Emotional Fire Safety Plan:

  • Identify Anna’s triggers and early warning signs of suicidal thoughts.
  • Develop coping strategies like relaxation techniques, self-soothing activities, or reaching out to support networks.
  • Include emergency contacts and crisis resources easily accessible to Anna.
  • Review and update the plan regularly with Anna’s involvement.

Remember, this information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute a professional assessment or intervention. Always consult with a qualified mental health professional for suicide risk assessment and support.

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.