Examine the surface water hydrology of Nigeria from the perspective of the Nigeriahydrological services
The hydrological services of Nigeria provide an essential source of information about the surface water features within the country. These services primarily focus on collecting and analyzing data related to precipitation, evaporation, transpiration, and other processes within the hydrologic cycle (Mbano et al., 2018). This includes things like basin runoff which is important for understanding how much water is available for human use in a certain area. Additionally, these services also monitor flood risks associated with excessive precipitation as well as changes to stream flow patterns which can affect navigation purposes or impact fish stocks and ecosystems (Mbano et al.,2018).
In addition to this basic analysis, Nigeria’s hydrological services also collaborate with stakeholders such as government agencies or local organizations in order to develop strategies for managing water resources more effectively. This can involve creating plans for optimal use of water during dry seasons, improving reservoir operations based on current conditions, or developing policies around development projects that might disrupt existing systems (Famurewa et al., 2019 ). By doing so, they are able to ensure that all users have access to adequate supplies while still upholding their responsibility towards environmental protection.
ion: A judicial process in which the disputing parties arrange for a neutral third party to decide the dispute for them. It is conducted under the provisions of the Arbitration Act 1996. The arbitration process can range from informal to formal, and the parties have some choice about the process. However it is still a legal process the parties present their cases and the arbitrator will make a decision on the issues. The decision is legally binding, with only a few rights of appeal against it.
Informal to formal, and the parties have some choice about the process
Litigation: When party or parties against each other take steps that may lead to a court trial and ultimately a resolution of the matter. Sometimes this could be the last option but could allow costs to be reimbursed and could allow for a successful completion if handled quickly (such as an out of court agreement between parties).
Recommendations: The important factor with dispute resolution is how the Project team (Client, Service provider, contractor and sub-contractors) are integrated at the start of this project. By this I mean the right procurement in the form of an Alliance agreement based on collaboration, shared resources and goals, and culture managed from the leadership down, to understand and trust in the team’s decisions and outcomes. Adjudication has particular relevance in the construction industry commonly used within NEC3 type contracts, and would be a relevant starting point.
Contracts can provide agreed dispute resolution procedures involving mediation, adjudication and arbitration and potentially a combination of all three with obligations to negotiate in good faith, potentially managed by dispute resolution boards, with partnering meetings to discuss obligations set out in the contract.
So why collaborate, and what can it do for all parties involved? The main need comes from restrictive budgets and the need to share resources, be it staff, contractors or local authority/ private sector combined buying power, but also to become more efficient a particular government driver. A good starting point is required from the outset in the procurement model, and may need to address cultural differences between parties, and how this can be embedded into a workable relationship.
With this project we could develop partnerships which many organisations such as Client, University of Brighton, Brighton and Hove City Council, Local Communities, Local interest groups (Cycle or e