Survey for a charity organization

 

Your Task

Your task is to design a brief survey for a charity organisation of your choice. You should choose a charity for this assignment and imagine that you design this survey on their behalf. In general, the charity organisation is interested in tertiary students’ [target market] awareness of your chosen organisation and their willingness to volunteer time to this organisation. You will also need to provide justification for your responses, please see Module 3 Assignment Rubric.

In particular, the charity organisation is interested in the following questions:
– To what extent are tertiary students aware of charity organisations, in general, and your chosen charity in particular (top of mind, prompted and unprompted)?
– What do tertiary students think of the perceived advantages and disadvantages of doing volunteer work?
– Have they done any volunteer work before? If yes, what and where?
– How likely would they do volunteer work for your CHOSEN charity? For other charities?
– Wat social media do they use? e.g., Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, and Snapchat etc.)?
– Demographics (Age and gender)
Length & Structure

Up to three pages (excluding the cover page). Material beyond three pages of ‘body’ will not be read.
You can decide how much of the three (3) pages your questionnaire and your justification will take up.

Tips

1. Review your assignment using the rubric in this hand-out as a checklist.
2. Signpost clearly (make good use of headings, white space, etc.)
3. Spell check – use New Zealand spelling, not US spelling.
4. Cut down on long words (use simple, easy to read but appropriate language).
5. Allow time between drafts. Never hand in your first draft. Do consider giving your final draft to somebody else to review your work.

Marking criteria
Please see Module 3 Assignment Rubric at the end of this handout. The Steps under Marking Criteria refer to the Steps in the Questionnaire Design that we covered in Session 9.
Please refer to the Department of Marketing Undergraduate Protocol for information about late assignments and plagiarism.

Module 3 – Assignment Marking Rubric

Marking criteria Poor
0 – 40% Average
41 – 60% Good
61 – 80% Excellent
81 – 100%
Step 1
All research questions are addressed
(25 marks)
The questionnaire fails to address all research questions The questionnaire addresses all research questions but also includes irrelevant information The questionnaire addresses all research questions with only including relevant information The questionnaire addresses all research questions with relevant information. Provides clear links and justification between the questions in the questionnaire and research questions.
Step 2
Survey Method
(25 marks) Survey method is not selected Survey method is selected, but it is incorrect Survey method is correct, but lacks justification Survey method is correctly selected and justified
Steps 3-6
Content, Structure and Wording of Individual Questions
(25 marks) Issues relating to content, structure and wording are not addressed (e.g. ambiguous and complex questions) Issues relating to content, structure and wording are mostly addressed Issues relating to content, structure and wording are correctly addressed Issues relating to content, structure and wording are correctly addressed and well-justified
Step 7-8
Flow, Form and Layout of the Questionnaire (25 marks)
Issues relating to order of the questions, logic of the questionnaire and layout are not addressed Issues relating to order of the questions, logic of the questionnaire and layout are mostly addressed Issues relating to order of the questions, logic of the questionnaire and layout are clearly and correctly addressed Issues relating to order of the questions, logic of the questionnaire and layout are correctly addressed and well-justified
Total 100 marks
___________/100

————————————————————————

 

 

 

Sample Solution

.1 The establishment of the abuse test and the precursor to Halifax: Emsland Stärke
Shortly after the ruling in Centros, the Court released the Emsland Stärke judgment. This case concerned the common agricultural policy. Emsland Stärke exported various forms of starch to Switzerland, and received an export refund for this. Immediately after, the same products were transported (unaltered) back to Germany, where they were sold. Upon return, the German authorities reclaimed the unduly granted refund back from Emsland Stärke.

Though the Court did not explicitly state that abuse of Community law is a general principle, it agreed with the Commission and implicitly did so. It set up a twofold test for determining such abuse; one part being objective and the other subjective. By including the subjective intention of an interested party involved, Emsland Stärke narrowed down the wide scope the prohibition of abuse had in Van Binsbergen, while conduct which under Centros criteria would be normally considered a mere exercise of fundamental freedoms, would instead constitute abuse, if the objective and subjective elements of the test were cumulatively met.

3.1.1 The Objective element
In establishing the objective element, the Court did not deviate from what was already established in previous caselaw. In order to fulfil this element, it must be proved that the person seeking to have the right has obtained it for the achievement of an “improper advantage, manifestly contrary to the objective of that provision”. Thus, if the right in question is exercised within the aims and limits of Union law, there is no abuse, merely a legitimate exercise of a right.

3.1.2 The Subjective element
The subjective element of this test attracted much controversy and produced much scholarly debate. Motives are irrelevant in this exercise, as they do not exist when it comes to legal persons. Determining that the transactions in question are created artificially in order to obtain an advantage from Union provisions must instead be determined by objective evidence and objective circumstances.

4 VAT: a system vulnerable to abuse

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.