Sustainable operations have many benefits for organizations

at
Categories
Tags

 

Although sustainable operations have many benefits for organizations, consumers, and society, they also come with many business risks. In this discussion, you will explore sustainability operations of major organizations to reflect on what they are doing well, the benefits their sustainable operations may bring, and the potential risks associated with their sustainable operations. In evaluating the risks and benefits of prioritizing sustainability, you will also learn the importance of justifying organizational priorities, which will assist you in completing the first section of your course project.

First, take some time to explore a few different organizations’ sustainable operations statements on their websites. You may explore organizations you are familiar with or use the following:

Starbucks Stories
Select Social Impact from the navigation bar, then select from the story topics in the drop-down menu to explore the stories. Be sure to explore the Sustainability topic.
L’Oréal Group: Commitments and Responsibilities
Dixie Cares: An Eye Toward the Future
Peabody: Sustainability Approach
In your initial post, address the following questions:

How did the organizations you explored address sustainability concerns inherent to their industry, if at all?
For example, a company that manufactures plastic has inherent environmental risks regarding plastic waste and pollution.
What other sustainable practices did the organizations you explored identify as priorities, and what kinds of business risks may they be taking on to prioritize those sustainable practices?
Do you think that the business risks the organizations are taking to prioritize their identified sustainable operations are worthwhile from a business perspective? Why or why not?
In your replies to at least two peers, contribute to the discussion by sharing the potential repercussions of not taking risks to prioritize sustainability. Examples of how you could contribute to the discussion include the following:

 

Sample Solution

Many individuals are becoming more and more concerned about sustainability, particularly in the corporate sphere. Our lives and the fate of all other creatures on the earth are still being impacted by climate change. Sustainable business practices are quickly becoming essential for company owners, managers, and administrators. NASA estimates that the likelihood of human activities contributing to the planet’s warming is greater than 95%. Because of its reliance on land, resources, fossil fuels, and continuous production and consumption, human industry contributes significantly to climate change. Understanding the problem at hand and how crucial it is to make changes — for the business and the planet — is the first step in making firms more sustainable.

tly, Vittola contends after a conflict, it is the obligation of the pioneer to judge how to manage the foe (Begby et al (2006b), Page 332).. Once more, proportionality is accentuated. For instance, the Versailles settlement forced after the First World War is tentatively excessively brutal, as it was not all Germany’s problem for the conflict. This is upheld by Frowe, who communicates two perspectives in jus post bellum: Minimalism and Maximalism, which are very varying perspectives. Minimalists recommend a more indulgent methodology while maximalist, supporting the above model, gives a crueler methodology, rebuffing the foe both financially and strategically (Frowe (2010), Page 208). At the last occurrence, be that as it may, the point of war is to lay out harmony security, so whatever should be done can be ethically legitimate, assuming it keeps the guidelines of jus promotion bellum. All in all, simply war hypothesis is truly contestable and can contend in various ways. In any case, the foundation of an equitable harmony is critical, making all war type circumstance to have various approaches to drawing closer (Frowe (2010), Page 227). By and by, the simply war hypothesis contains jus promotion bellum, jus in bello and jus post bellum, and it tends to be either ethically disputable or legitimate contingent upon the proportionality of the situation. In this manner, there can’t be one conclusive hypothesis of the simply war yet just a hypothetical manual for show how wars ought to be battled, showing normativity in its record, which responds to the inquiry to what a conflict hypothesis is.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.
Hi, how can I help?