Swot Analysis

 

Review the Jasper Gardens Nursing Home case study in this week’s Learning Resources.
Analyze strengths of the organization. Consider the following questions:
What does this organization do particularly well? Does it have a specific and recognized niche?
What resources does the organization have that might set it apart from its competition or position it for future growth?
What does the market perceive as strengths of the organization?
What financial considerations are relevant to its strengths?
Analyze weaknesses of the organization. Consider the following questions:
What needs improvement within the organization?
What resource deficits might impact this organization?
What does the market perceive as weaknesses of the organization?
What financial considerations are relevant to weaknesses?
Analyze opportunities of the organization. Consider the following questions:
With strengths and weaknesses in mind, what opportunities are available to this organization?
Are there current trends that might translate into opportunities?
Analyze threats to the organization. Consider the following questions:
What competitive threats exist for the organization?
Do insufficient or outdated resources hamper the organization?
Are there any current trends that might translate into threats?
Do any market, regulatory, and/or legal issues present threats?

Figure 1.2 Wiener’s agglutinogen hypothesis.

1.3.3 Tippett’s Two-Locus Model

In 1986, Tippett (7), proposed another model of Rh qualities, which dependent on serological information, he hypothesized that lone two Rh qualities controlling the statement of the Rh antigens, one encoding D antigen, and the second encoding the other four antigens (C, c, E and e).

The advanced atomic science methods revealed the exactness of Tippett’s two-locus hypothesis, and they have affirmed that neither of Fisher nor Wiener speculations was totally right. Nonetheless, Fisher’s and Wiener’s documentations still ordinarily utilized conversely in numerous logical papers and by most blood donation centers, because of its advantageous method to clarify and convey Rh phenotypes and genotypes (8-10).

1.3.4 Rh Numeric Terminologies:

As the Rh blood bunch framework extended, since numerous Rh antigens have been found, it is turned out to be progressively hard to offer names to new antigens utilizing the past classifications. Along these lines, numeric terminologies have been risen, which were not rely upon the hereditary premise, nor on a hypothesis of Rh legacy.

In the 1962, Rosenfield (11), starts the principal numeric phrasing, they approach a numeric framework that designate a sequential number to every Rh antigen arranged by its revelation date. As per this classification, the phenotype is exhibiting by the nearness or nonappearance of the antigen on the RBC. Where a less sign go before number for the negative antigen. The five significant antigens (D, C, E, c and e) are appointed as (Rh1 Rh2, Rh3 Rh4, and Rh5) individually

4.

The International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT) presently perceives 36 human blood bunch frameworks and more than 300 diverse blood-bunch antigens have been distinguished (2). Though each blood bunch framework made out of at least one antigens that must be encoded by a solitary quality locus or by a complex of at least two firmly connected homologous qualities, with no recombination happening between them.

Biochemical structure of blood bunch antigens contrasts relying upon the blood bunch framework, and they fall into two primary sorts, either protein atoms or starch particles on glycoproteins and glycolipids.

1.2 Historical Background of Rh Blood Group System

Rh blood bunch framework has not found until 1939, when Levine and Stetson announced cut off Hemolytic Transfusion Reaction (HTR) for an obstetrical patient who had transfused with an ABO perfect blood from her better half, after conveyance of a stillborn youngster. Levine and Stetson distinguished an alloantibody in the mother serum, which respond at room temperature and 37″C with spouse RBCs and with 80% of Caucasians RBCs. They hypothesized that this counter acting agent had created against a particular factor in both hatchling and father RBCs that the mother need. Levine recommended that this counter acting agent had created during the mother pregnancy after her introduction to an outside factor from her baby (3).

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.