Talk about Vaccines.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PART 1 QUESTIONS

Let’s talk about Vaccines. In the early 20th-Century, they were viewed as a “miracle of science”. But now at the beginning of the 21st-Century, they have become very controversial.

– Why is this an issue?
– What are the arguments for/against mandatory vaccines?
– Should people be allowed to opt out, and under what circumstances?

Many schools require vaccines for students to attend, and even some countries require proof of vaccination.

– Are these organizations overstepping their authority, or is this really for the public health good? Please cite your sources, even if it’s an example of bad information.

 

PART 2

Directions
For your assignment:

While no one is immune from all disease, and the natural course of aging, there are many things seniors can do to stay healthy, or slow the progression of disease. (5pts)

1. Create a list of 5-10 practices for healthy aging. (citations expected)

2. These are likely good practices for anyone, but why do you thing these are specifically good for an aging population? What might this help them improve or avoid?

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death for all ages. Complete a quick profile of a specific cancer of your choice. (5pts). Cite your sources.

1. Type of cancer, who’s affected,
2. What are the characteristics (ie symptoms, organs targeted), What is the incidence (how many affected)
3. Is this treatable? What is the survival rate?
4. What lifestyle choices (if any) put people at risk for this cancer?

 

 

Sample Solution

Talk about Vaccines

Mandatory vaccination is something that has long been debated. On the pro side are those who say that legislation has had a dramatic effect in other areas of public health and safety (such as the indoor smoking ban, and use of seat belts) so why not do the same with immunization. Others are more reserved however, expressing concerns that there is a lack of evidence that mandatory vaccinations actually helps to increase uptake. Vaccination is one of the most effective public health interventions in the world for saving lives and promoting good health. Making vaccination compulsory is not the only way to obtain high vaccination rates. Perhaps making vaccination a core part of the education curriculum could help future generations be less hesitant to vaccinate.

have instated a Communist regime, was widely spread and, as Folch-Serra argues ‘systematically enforced through schools and textbooks, the pulpit, the Fascist institutions and the media’ (p. 228). There was heavy censorship of news that could have challenged this image, which Folch-Serra shows was ‘illustrated by the Spanish media’s disregard of the Nobel prizes awarded to Juan Ramón Jiménez for literature in 1956 and Severo Ochoa for science in 1959’ (p. 229). This leads on to the contradictory nature of Franco’s treatment of the Republicans since, as well as spreading defamatory comments about their nature, there was also, as Folch-Serra explains, a ‘suppression of information about their fate and whereabouts’ (p. 229) which drew from a ‘deliberate policy of oblivion and silence’ (p. 229). By winning the Civil War, Franco also won the fortune of being able to rewrite history and, as Folch-Serra confirms, he was able to ‘concoct a uniform image of the defeated as one and the same’ (p. 227). Amongst other forms of propaganda, education allowed Franco to disseminate his version of events as truth, which can be seen through school textbooks which Xavier Laudo elaborates on how they ‘spoke of the desertion of Republican soldiers’ as well as presenting Republican Spain as the ‘enemy within’ (p. 442) who were ‘responsible for the erosion of the nation’s Christian faith’ (p. 442). Assmann further shows how this ‘one sided version of history’ (p. 64) not only ‘protected’ (p. 65) and legitimised Franco, but also ‘prolonged the enemy stereotype of the murdered communists and democrats’ (p. 65). Thus, it can be seen that Franco manipulated the memory of the Civil War during his dictatorship and how his policies towards the Republicans after the war allowed him to promote his narrative as the truth and legitimise his position. This collective amnesia that Franco wanted to induce, discredited and erased his opponent from history. However, Assmann adds that this ‘silence did not dissolve the memory of the traumatic past’ (p. 66) and did not fully discredit his opponents, as individual memories of the events were ‘materially preserved in the earth and in families’ (p. 66). Memory also featured heavily in Franco’s propaganda, with many references made to returning Spain to the greatness it had once experienced. Franco’s message regarding the Republicans was spread through education and Laudo explains that so was the image of the Civil War as a ‘crusade’ (p. 438) such as during the Middle Ages. Zheng Wang describes how school textbooks can be used as ‘instruments for glorifying the nation, consolidating its national identity and justifying particular forms of social and political systems ‘ and how the rewriting of school textbooks can be used to ‘legitimise the new regime’ (p. 45). This is evident on the front cover of El Libro de España, which features a boat sailing across the globe, against the backdrop of the Spanish flag. This reminds the viewer of the Spanish Empire, as Laudo confirms, ‘stressing the cross-Atlantic colonialist adventures in the Americas’ (p. 443), and the power and glory that this brought, ‘promoting a spirit of patriotism’ (p.443). Through this, Laudo explains that Franco was able to propagate his ‘vision of Spain’s history, its Hispanic mission for imperial glory’ (p. 453). Religious references were frequently seen in Franco’s propaganda, and comparisons were made to the Catholic monarchs and the unity and greatness Spain experienced under them. Miriam

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.