Tanaka is a Japanese exchange student in a United States’ university

 

Tanaka is a Japanese exchange student in a United States’ university. He had the following conversation with his chemistry professor, Mr. Smith, one day after class.
“How are things going, Tanaka?” asked Prof. Smith. “Things are going well, Prof Smith”, answered Tanaka with eyes cast down. “Are you sure?” Prof. Smith asked unconvinced. Perplexed by Prof. Smith’s concern, Tanaka replied with eyes still cast down, “Professor Smith, I am quite sure, everything is fine.” “Well, you are so quiet in class; I thought perhaps you did not understand the lesson.”

 

What cultural influences do you think played a part in this communication sequence—from any of the reading this semester?
How could the communication between Tanaka and Prof. Smith have been more successful?
What style of communication is causing Prof Smith to probe the student for more info and what is it about Prof Smith’s culture that is different from the students that is causing this?

 

Sample Solution

Cultural Influences in the Conversation

This conversation highlights the clash between American direct communication and Japanese indirect communication styles. Here’s a breakdown of the cultural influences:

  • American Directness: Smith’s approach is likely influenced by American cultural norms that value directness, assertiveness, and open expression of feelings. He asks Tanaka “Are you sure?” because his quiet demeanor doesn’t convey Tanaka’s true feelings.
  • Japanese Indirectness: Tanaka, on the other hand, is influenced by Japanese cultural norms that emphasize politeness, indirectness, and avoiding confrontation. Even though he might be struggling, replying with “everything is fine” while looking down avoids potential conflict and conveys a desire to not cause trouble.

Improving the Communication

Here’s how the communication could be improved:

  • Smith:
    • Acknowledge the cultural difference: Smith could acknowledge the cultural difference by saying, “In our class, participation is encouraged. Is there anything you’d like to discuss about the lesson?” This opens the door for Tanaka to participate without feeling pressured.
    • Offer alternative ways to participate: Smith could offer alternative ways for Tanaka to participate besides speaking up in class. This might include written responses, small group discussions, or online forums.
  • Tanaka:
    • Express appreciation for concern:Tanaka could express appreciation for Prof. Smith’s concern by saying, “Thank you for asking, Professor. I’m a bit quiet in class, but I’m following along.”
    • Offer a brief explanation (optional):If comfortable, Tanaka could offer a brief explanation for his quietness, like, “I’m still adjusting to the new environment.”

Communication Styles and Cultural Differences

  • Smith’s Communication Style: Prof. Smith’s probing style likely stems from a culture that values clear communication and identifying any potential problems. He might be concerned about Tanaka’s academic success and wants to ensure understanding.
  • Cultural Difference: American culture generally encourages open communication in classrooms, with participation seen as a sign of engagement. In contrast, Japanese culture emphasizes respect for the teacher and may view excessive talking as disrespectful. Additionally, expressing confusion or difficulty can be seen as a burden on the teacher.

By understanding these cultural differences, both parties can adjust their communication styles for a more successful interaction.

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.