Targeting Consumers (and Using Their Secrets)

 

 

Data mining of large data sets, frequently called Big Data, has become a big part of analyzing consumer-related data that companies collect. Basically, data mining is a computational process of extracting information patterns from data sets and transforming it into more organized uses for the future. Usually this information is used to increase sales, reduce costs, or otherwise improve operations or profits. Obviously, if retailers could predict based on past purchasing patterns what consumers might buy in the future, this would be extremely valuable in target marketing.
The statistical team at Target, the giant national retailer, used data mining techniques to determine whether and when a woman was going to have a baby long before she ever purchased diapers from their stores. The marketing plan was then to target ads toward the woman for purchases she might be thinking about for the future. A conversation with one of Target’s statisticians revealed how this worked.
Apparently, Target assigns every customer a Guest ID number and links this with your name, the credit cards you use, addresses, phone numbers, and e-mail addresses they are able to ascertain. They collect all the demographic data they can gather or perhaps buy from others. Their statisticians then decided to analyze the women’s purchases who had signed up on Baby Registries in the past and then study their purchasing patterns before their babies were born. They discovered through data analysis that certain purchasing patterns did emerge. For example, the analysts noticed that women started buying huge quantities of lotion during the beginning of their second trimester of pregnancy. They also discovered that during their first 20 weeks of pregnancy, women stocked up on calcium, magnesium, and zinc supplements. The analysts also detected that as the woman was approaching her delivery date, she bought larger quantities of scent-free soap, cotton balls, hand sanitizer, and washcloths.
After their analysis, the Target team concluded that there was a set of 25 products, which when analyzed together yielded what they termed a “pregnancy prediction score.” They concluded they could closely predict that a woman was pregnant and when the baby was due to be born and could target their ads to the woman based on what they expected her needs at that time would be. To their benefit, by getting the women to shop at Target during an expensive and habit-forming period of her life, she could be made a customer for life.
The Father from Minneapolis
As a result of one set of mailings going out, an angry father showed up at his Target store one day demanding to speak to the manager. In his hands were a fistful of coupons sent to his daughter who lived at home in Minneapolis. His complaint was that his daughter, who was still in high school, was receiving mailed ads for maternity clothes and cribs. He angrily asked the manager “Are you trying to encourage her to get pregnant?”
Not sure what was going on, the manager apologized to the angry father and called him on the phone several days later to apologize again. At this point, the father started changing his tune. He uncomfortably told the manager that he’d had a talk with his daughter and discovered that there were some things going on around his house of which he was unaware. He confessed that he’d discovered that his daughter was due in August and he said that he owed the manager an apology himself.
As a result of the New York Times reporter investigating Target’s data mining approaches and wanting to know more, Target decision makers finally figured out that some of what they were doing may not be appropriate. They eventually concluded that not everyone wanted them to know this much about their personal lives. They discovered that as long as women didn’t know they were being spied on they would use the coupons sent them. But, once they discovered how Target knew to send them these coupons—because of their reproductive status—some of them were quite upset. The company decided to slow down and think about this target marketing scheme a bit more.
Realizing that the company had the ability to create custom advertising booklets, a process that they had used in the past with other products, the company decided to put its ads for baby items in booklets where the baby products were paired with other items such as wine glasses or lawn mowers so that the advertising appeared to be random and not profiled toward an expectant mother. This advertising program was then used. Target discovered that not too long after this revised advertising approach was begun, its sales in the Mom and Baby category increased impressively.
Others Use of Big Data
Many companies today mine Big Data to gather insights into consumers’ likely purchasing habits. For example, Facebook recently reported that it collects data on 1.6 billion consumers, including their “likes” and social connections, to identify behavioral patterns that they might use in their product design and marketing. Increasingly, companies are mining social media data, Internet searches, purchasing behavior, and publically available data sets to improve their products, track trends, and place ads. Recently, Microsoft reported that it had conducted a study suggesting that a consumer’s search queries might provide clues that a person has cancer even before such a diagnosis is made.
Because of the concern for consumer users’ privacy and the public furor it has caused in the past, Facebook announced that it was starting to use an internal review process to assess the ethical impact of each of its research efforts. It has established a five-person group of employees, including experts in law and ethics. Then, if a manager thinks that a research project deals with a sensitive topic, the proposal will get a review by the group to consider its risks and benefits and to consider consumers’ expectations about how their personal information is being used.
Questions for Discussion
1. What are the social and ethical issues in this case? Who are the affected stakeholders and what are their stakes?
2. Target’s practice of predicting a woman’s pregnancy and then exploiting it commercially was legal. Was it ethical? If you were the woman in the case and you learned what Target had done, what terms would you use to describe their practice?
3. Would you feel deceived, tricked, or exploited if a company predicted a purchasing expectation of yours that you felt was private or intimate? What, if anything, would you do about it?
4. How do you evaluate Target’s new approach to disguise the ads by mixing them in with other, unrelated ads?
5. What is your assessment of Facebook’s efforts to protect consumers’ privacy? Or, is it really to protect the company should questions be raised?
6. Have companies gone too far in their statistical analytics and use of Big Data and data mining such as that described in this case? Is it ethical for companies to use data mining to target market customers based on the patterns they detected?

 

Sample Solution

ority is given to him. This is further supported by Aristotle’s Politics ((1996), Page 28): ‘a king is the natural superior of his subjects.’ However, he does later emphasise to put all faith in the prince is wrong and has consequences; a thorough examination of the cause of war is required along with the willingness to negotiate rival party (Begby et al (2006b), Page 312& 318). This is supported by the actions of Hitler are deemed unjustly. Also, in today’s world, wars are no longer fought only by states but also non-state actors like Al-Queda and ISIS, showing Vittola’s normative claim on authority is outdated. This is further supported by Frowe’s claim that the leader needs to represent the people’s interests, under legitimate authority, which links on to the fourth condition: Public declaration of war. Agreed with many, there must be an official announcement on a declaration of war (Frowe (2011), Page 59-60&63).
Finally, the most controversial condition is that wars should have a reasonable chance of success. As Vittola reiterated, the aim of war is to establish peace and security; securing the public good. If this can’t be achieved, Frowe argues it would be better to surrender to the enemy. This can be justified because the costs of war would have been bigger (Frowe (2011), Page 56-7).
Consequently, jus ad bellum comprises several conditions but most importantly: just cause and proportionality. This gives people a guide whether it’s lawful to enter a war or not. However, this is only one part of the theory of the just war. Nevertheless, it can be seen above that jus ad bellum can be debated throughout, showing that there is no definitive theory of a just war, as it is normatively theorised.

Jus in bello

The second section begins deciphering jus in bello or what actions can we classify as permissible in just wars (Begby et al (2006b), Page 323).
First, it is never just to intentionally kill innocent people in wars, supported by Vittola’s first proposition. This is widely accepted as ‘all people have a right not to be killed’ and if a soldier does, they have violated that right and lost their right. This is further supported by “non-combatant immunity” (Frowe (2011), Page 151), which leads to the question of combatant qualification mentioned later in the essay. This is corroborated by the bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima, ending the Second World War, where millions were intently killed, just to secure the aim of war. However, sometimes civilians are accidentally killed through wars to achieve their goal of peace and security. This is supported by Vittola, who implies proportionality again to justify action: ‘care must be taken where evil doesn’t outweigh the possible benefits (Begby et al (2006b), Page 325).’ This is further supported by Frowe who explains it is lawful to unintentionally kill, whenever the combatant has full knowledge of his actions and seeks to complete his aim, but it would come at a cost. However, this does not hide the fact the unintended still killed innocent people, showing immorality in their actions. Thus, it depends again on proportionality as Thomson argues (Frowe (2011), Page 141).
This leads to question of what qualifies to be a combatant, and whether it is lawful to kill each other as combatants. Combatants are people who are involved directly or indirectly with the war and it is lawful to kill ‘to shelter the innocent from harm…punish evildoers (Begby et al (2006b), Page 290).However, as mentioned above civilian cannot be harmed, showing combatants as the only legitimate targets, another condition of jus in bello, as ‘we may not use the sword against those who have not harmed us (Begby et al (2006b), Page 314).’ In addition, Frowe suggested combatants must be identified as combatants, to avoid

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.