Prepare a one page on Technology and Product Management. You may research the internet for more information.
“Today’s product manager is increasingly the product’s mini-CEO.”
They establish the product vision and strategy while leading a diverse team (engineers, designers, marketeers, and so on) to deliver the best product to market. They establish the product roadmap, which includes features and needs, as well as the business case for it. They’re in charge of expressing the “what” and collaborating with the technical team to create a successful product. Product managers must be user experts in order to offer the proper product to the market. They are continually analyzing user needs and anticipating future requirements. Product managers must be capable of receiving and analyzing feedback.
association, because of the huge number of requirements on a circumstance (Flinsch-Rodriguez, 2019). Fiedler, in his Contingency Theory of Leadership (Fiedler, 1967), recommends that the viability of a gathering is subject to the administration styles of the pioneer and their favourability to the circumstance. A large part of the hypothesis is laid out around the most un-favored colleague scale (LPC). The LPC expects to measure a potential chiefs way to deal with an errand on a size of relationship roused to task spurred, where the pioneer fits on the scale permits what is happening to be reasoned, and in this manner permits the distinguishing proof of appropriate pioneers for undertakings. The favourableness of the circumstance relies upon three qualities: pioneer part relations, the help and trust the pioneer as from the gathering; task structure, the lucidity of the errand to the pioneer; and positional power, the power the pioneer needs to survey a gatherings execution and give prizes and disciplines (Fiedler, 1967). In the event that the pioneers approach matches what is expected from going on, achievement is anticipated for the gathering. Fiedler’s possibility model offers an exceptionally grave categorisation of administration, obviously characterizing which circumstances endlessly won’t bring about progress for a likely pioneer. At the senior administration level of a hierarchal construction inside an association the hypothesis can be applied openly, right off the bat because of the simplicity at which people can be supplanted on the off chance that their LPC score doesn’t match that expected of the circumstance (Pettinger, 2007). Furthermore, and in particular, is to guarantee that the senior administration are ideally suited to effectively lead the association. Notwithstanding, further down the order Fielder’s possibility hypothesis starts to hold substantially less significance, it becomes unfeasible according to a hierarchical viewpoint because of the quantity of individuals at this degree of initiative. The strategies of coordinating the pioneer with their most un-favored collaborator is difficult to reliably accomplish, so a more continuum based approach is required.