Telehealth Issues in Consulting Psychology Practice,”

 

Telehealth Issues in Consulting Psychology Practice,” and Luxton, et al. (2011), “mHealth for Mental Health: Integrating Smartphone Technology in Behavioral Healthcare” articles.

Assess the evidence-based practices implemented in this case study. In your paper, include the following.

Explain the connection between each theoretical orientation used by Dr. Bank’s and the interventions utilized in the case.
Describe the concept of dialectical behavior therapy, being sure to include the six main points of this type of treatment.
Explain Dr. Banks’s primary goal during the pre-treatment stage and how Dr. Banks related this to Karen in her initial therapy sessions.
Describe the two formats that Dr. Banks told Karen would be part of her treatment program.
Describe the focus of the second and third stages of treatment.
Assume the role of a consulting clinical or counseling psychologist on this case, and recommend at least one technology-based e-therapy tool that would be useful. Explain liability issues related to delivering e-therapy consultation, supporting your response with information from the Miller (2006), “Telehealth Issues in Consulting Psychology Practice” article.
Evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment interventions implemented by Dr. Banks supporting your statements with information from the case and two to three peer-reviewed articles from the University of Arizona Global Campus Library, in addition to those required for this week.
Recommend three additional treatment interventions that would be appropriate in this case. Use information from the Sneed, Fertuck, Kanellopoulos, and Culang-Reinlieb (2012), “Borderline Personality Disorder” article to help support your recommendations. Justify your selections with information from the case.

Sample Solution

Dr. Bank’s utilizes a variety of theoretical orientations to inform his practice, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy, systems theory, and positive psychology. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) places an emphasis on the relationships between thoughts, feelings, and behaviors in order to understand how they can affect one another. It uses this understanding to develop strategies for addressing problematic behaviors (Hersen & Grossiorelli, 2008). In the case study with Mrs. Smith, Dr. Banks utilized CBT by teaching her coping strategies and relaxation techniques to reduce her anxiety about the telemedicine appointment; he also provided cognitive reframing exercises which focused on viewing the situation from different perspectives that were not as threatening or overwhelming (Luxton et al., 2011).

Systems Theory is a holistic approach which looks at patterns of behavior within social contexts like families or organizations in order to identify underlying issues that may be contributing towards certain problems. In this case study , Dr. Bank’s explored potential sources for Mrs . Smith’s difficulty adjusting to telehealth – such as accessibility issues caused by technology or lack of experience using online communication tools – before recommending further interventions (Telehealth Issues in Consulting Psychology Practice ).

Finally, Positive Psychology focuses on fostering positive experiences through activities like identifying strengths, practicing gratitude, and setting meaningful goals. By applying these concepts during their session together, Dr. Banks was able to help encourage better engagement while providing greater meaning behind Mrs. Smith’s new approaches towards managing her health condition ( Luxton et al., 2011).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The “Telehealth Issues in Consulting Psychology Practice” article examines the potential of telehealth technology to enhance consulting psychology practice. It discusses the ethical, legal, and practical considerations that need to be addressed before telehealth therapy can become an accepted practice in this field. The authors provide a framework for how clinicians should assess and consider the risks associated with telehealth services, as well as strategies for best utilizing such services to ensure patient safety and quality care.

The “mHealth for Mental Health: Integrating Smartphone Technology in Behavioral Healthcare” article explores the potential of using mobile health (mHealth) technologies, such as virtual visits through smartphones or tablets, to improve mental health treatment outcomes by providing greater access to information and communication between providers and patients. The authors discuss research into mHealth approaches that have been conducted so far and suggest ways that these could be effectively utilized in clinical practice. They emphasize the importance of understanding usage patterns within target populations when designing mHe

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conservative Alliance. On October 29, 2015, Stephanie Schriock of The Slope, guarantees the Casual get-together has proactively been “fixing the legislative guide with safe conservative regions,” getting seats they typically wouldn’t get an opportunity at winning. This pattern could extend across ideological group limits as “floor crossing” and between party alliances shaped to create specific political race results.

At last, the drawn out ramifications of applying Brazilian appointive approaches to the US could demonstrate deplorable. With a generally debilitating party framework, the possibilities of agreement and pay off will rise dramatically. Moreover, as the US keeps on encountering a shrinking working class, there would be cause for more prominent social uprisings. Adding into the class structure evaluation, “class structures have become undeniably more spellbound in cutting edge entrepreneur nations,” (Bastos, 153), and with implausible portrayal all in all, the polarization would keep on deteriorating.

Presently the issue with this speculative situation is only that, it is theoretical. The different ramifications that have been expressed lead one down an elusive slant that breeds negativity and dismisses the chance of a positive result. To the extent that any political specialist can perceive, a corresponding framework might just be the response to fix the US polarization, taking into consideration better portrayal of regions, for example, the “neglected” moderate Rust Belt, the frank liberal West Coast, and the blended moderate/moderate East Coast. Thus, while dissecting what is happening, for example, this, it critical to observe that there basically isn’t sufficient proof to help which type of a majority rules system will be more useful than another. There are many variables that become possibly the most important factor including society, ongoing political and social history, and eagerness to change to give some examples. In help, that’s what niel Franzese considers “an absence of definitive examinations with discoveries subverting the open essential framework is reason to the point of allowing the proposed new framework an opportunity,” (Franzese, 274).

While we might in all likelihood can’t be sure whether open-list relative portrayal would be helpful for the US world of politics, what we in all actuality do know is clear. Right now, the open-list PR is creating some issues inside Brazil’s administration and is bringing about friendly exhibits against the public authority. This has been more than featured by the reprimand of their leader Dilma Rousseff, whose political circumstance likewise reveals insight into what president-elect Trump might look soon. Furthermore, socio-political turm

This question has been answered.

Get Answer