The Actor’s Characterization and Believability.


Please choose one of the following actors, and one of their films listed. Use only actors and films listed. After viewing the film, share your reaction to the physical and vocal choices the actor made in the film, their level of commitment to creating a character, and how successfully believable was their performance. Did you believe their performance? If so cite examples to help support your thoughts. . The main objective of this response paper is to see the actor in the film through your eyes. This response is your reaction and no outside research is needed, however if you do include any research or outside quotes, you must cite properly.

Lillian Gish: Broken Blossoms (1919), Way Down East (1920)
Max Schreck: Nosferatu (1922)
Harold Lloyd: Safety Last (1923)
Charlie Chaplin: The Kid (1921), The Gold Rush (1925), City Light (1931), Modern Times (1936), The Great Dictator (1940)
Buster Keaton: The General (1927), Steamboat Bill Jr. (1928)
Janet Gaynor: Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans (1927), A Star is Born (1938)
Louise Brooks: Diary of a Lost Girl (1929), Pandora’s Box (1929)
Bela Lugosi: Dracula (1931)
Boris Karloff: Frankenstein (1931)
Joan Crawford: Grand Hotel (1932)
Paul Muni: I Am A Fugitive from a Chain Gang (1932), Scarface (1932)
James Cagney: Public Enemy (1931), Angels with Dirty Faces (1938), Yankee Doodle Dandy (1942), White Heat (1949)
Greta Garbo: Grand Hotel (1932), Ninotchka (1939)
Mae West: I’m No Angel (1933), She Done Him Wrong (1933)
The Marx Brothers: Duck Soup (1933), A Night at The Opera (1935)
Clark Gable: It Happened One Night (1934), Gone With the Wind (1939)
Claudette Colbert: It Happened One Night (1934), Imitation of Life (1934), Since You Went Away (1944)
Louise Beavers: Imitation of Life (1934)
Shirley Temple: Bright Eyes (1934), The Little Colonel (1935), Heidi (1937), The Little Princess (1939)
Robert Donat: The 39th Steps (1935), Goodbye Mr. Chips (1939)
Fred Astaire: Top Hat (1935), Swing Time (1936)
Ginger Rogers: Top Hat (1935), Swing Time (1936), Stage Door (1937), I’ll Be Seeing You (1944)
Robert Donat: The 39th Steps (1935), Goodbye Mr. Chips (1939)
Gary Cooper: Mr. Deeds Goes to Town (1936), The Pride of the Yankees (1942)
Katharine Hepburn: Bringing Up Baby (1938), Adam’s Rib (1949)
Fredric March: A Star is Born (1938)



Sample Solution





Network Forging

The requirement for socialization and personality makes a nearby network connect that numerous individuals keep up all through their lifetime. Their lives may focus on religion, ethnicity, or even the financial class to which the person has a place. The people group mirrors these angles by gathering people in comparable circumstances and convictions. The bound Western dress of Pang-Mei Natasha Chang clarifies the significance of custom and culture in the network’s personality by clarifying the connection between conventional Chang Yu-I’s life and Westernized Xu Zhimo I am communicating.

Both Findhorn and Auroville were built up as a rebel ideal world, a retreat of the Western world that was established during the 1960s. Joined by delicate total of different conviction frameworks, these are cognizant networks – global free self-ruling ideal world network, not a network worked by history, culture or group. A significant number of these organizations have fizzled (478 cognizant networks have contracted to 112 in the previous a long time since the 1920 ‘s), they are presently the two biggest otherworldly focuses on the planet. They have around 200 enormous private networks and bolster themselves by offering courses for some guests (Findhorn has 1,200 paid visitors for each year and Auroville has There are more than 50,000 guests).

In 1953, humanist Robert Nisbet recommended that another type of network “identified with contemporary life and thought” ought to be in any event incompletely settled via scanning for a more grounded network. This idea despite everything applies, except today it might mean thinking about how religion, governmental issues, and network support are most appropriate to the American reality. To do that, we have to make ventures to make parks and entertainment focuses alluring and advance the development of the network. At the end of the day, this implies underlining and upgrading hierarchical examples that give individuals the force – to give them instruments to recover their capacity

For the offspring of the club, this is an issue, they generally respect innovation and family authority – adjustment and homogenization as an approach to assemble a network. They emanate their own natural cadence delicately from the phase toward a radiant doof-doof-doof so they use medication to become companions, medication and become companions . A couple of years prior, in the equivalent “Yearly Trends” paper, Disclosure and Rudimental ‘s “move/well known” revisionism was appreciated and pundit Philip Sherburne composed that move music observes “Cheerful Giving” once more. In 2015, a gathering of individuals of this sort of vanguard group surrendered delight