Integrate your findings from Assessments 1–4 and describe how the survey was conducted. You will also reflect on the limitations of the survey and think about potential improvements for a future study.
Demonstration of Proficiency
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria.
Competency 1: Interpret a data set’s central tendency and variability using descriptive statistical procedures.
Interpret summary statistics for all survey questions.
Competency 2: Evaluate the adequacy of data collection methods.
Evaluate constraints or limitations of conclusions based on survey results.
Competency 3: Derive logical conclusions for inferential statistical calculations.
Derive logical conclusions for inferential statistical calculations.
Competency 4: Solve problems in your personal and professional life by applying statistical procedures.
Interpret statistical analysis of data to explain the meaning of the survey results.
Explain the significance of survey results to research goals addressing an issue in one’s personal or professional life.
Competency 5: Evaluate statistical arguments.
above) to further prove his conclusion. For the Modal Argument, Jackson relies on the principle that “no amount of physical information about another logically entails that he or she is conscious or feels anything at all” (Jackson). Physicalists and qualia believers alike can agree that there is a possibility of a world identical to ours in every physical respect but different in that the organisms that occupy this identical world have no mental capacity or life at all. As there is something about us that gives us mental capacity that they lack, physicalism must be false because there is more to us than the purely physical.
Although the Modal Argument and the What it is Like Argument are substantial, the depth of Jackson’s argument against physicalism primarily relies on the Knowledge Argument. In order to prevent confusion, Jackson clarifies three things regarding the Knowledge Argument and Mary.
There are some philosophers who do not necessarily align with Jackson’s perspective. David Lewis has the strongest objection to Jackson’s qualia position. Lewis shapes his objection to Jackson using the Ability Hypothesis and the Hypothesis of Phenomenal Information. Lewis argues that Mary leaves the black and white room, she learns she has the ability to know what seeing red is like. Thus, Mary is becoming aware of abilities, not learning new information. That is, Mary learns the ability to see red. Lewis uses the Hypothesis of Phenomenal Information to argue