THE AMERICAN RED CROSS.

 

-Research THE AMERICAN RED CROSS. Determine how the organization or agency contributes to public health and safety improvements, promotes equal opportunity, and improves the quality of life within the community.
-Submit your findings in a APA 3–5-page report.
Graded Requirements The research requirements, outlined below, correspond to the grading criteria in the assessment scoring guide, so be sure to address each point.
• Explain how the organization’s mission and vision enable it to contribute to public health and safety improvements.
• Include examples of ways a local and/or global initiative supports organizational mission and vision and promotes public health and safety.
o Evaluate an organization’s ability to promote equal opportunity and improve the quality of life in the community.
• Consider the effects of social, cultural, economic, and physical barriers.
o Assess the impact of funding sources, policy, and legislation on the organization’s provision of services.
• Consider the potential implications of funding decisions, policy, and legislation for individuals, families, and aggregates within the community.
o Explain how an organization’s work impacts the health and/or safety needs of a local community. • Consider how nurses might become involved with the organization.

 

Sample Solution

THE AMERICAN RED CROSS

The American Red Cross, a humanitarian organization led by volunteers and guided by its Congressional Charter and the Fundamental Principles of the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, provide relief to victims of disasters and help people prevent, prepare for and respond to emergencies. The Red Cross provides support for the local health systems` capacity to prepare for and responds to disasters by operating in emergency relief, reconstruction and rehabilitation, and long-term development cooperation. The protection of public health is primarily a function of the government. Volunteer agencies such as the Red Cross tend to target their efforts toward supplementing and supporting the work of these official government agencies.

ecisions are capital investment decisions designed to replace older assets with newer ones (DeBenedetti, n.d.).

Regardless of the type of capital investment decision facing managers, there are usually groups of individuals, or entire departments, which are interested in pursuing one particular project over another.  Project ranking is not uncommon in today’s business environment and is dependent on the fact as to how much the specific projects would return, as well as which project has the ability to provide the business the greatest value in the shortest amount of time.  The majority of capital investment decisions are reached with specified deadlines in mind which can result in more than one step in the decision-making process being ignored.  This, coupled with rivalry within departments, can bring about poor outcomes.

After management narrows down the list of potential projects, they must then start the process of using capital budgeting decision tools to reach their final decision.  Several tools can be used; however, the most common are the payback period, net present value method, and the internal rate of return method (Noreen, Brewer, & Garrison, 2014, p. 318).

Out of the three methods, the payback period is one of the most popular due to its basic and simple calculation, although it does not factor in the time value of money like some of the other methods.  The payback period in essence allows one to calculate how long it would take for a project to recapture the cost of the initial investment (Noreen, Brewer, & Garrison, 2014, p. 327).  The calculation is simple as it is the total cost of the project divided by the estimated cash inflows expected each year.  The end result is the number of years to recover the initial cost, or the payback period. As an example, my employer used this method as a guideline when deciding which research projects should/should not be undertaken.  Although the assumption is that most research projects will generate revenue for the organization, it isn’t known how long it will take before the healthcare organization recoups the investment they initially put into the project to get it off the ground. Based on the results of the payback method, leadership will decide whether or not to accept or reject the project if the payback period is too far out of their comfort zone.

There was a case recently in which one of our research sites prop

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.