The Black Lives Matter

Write a [Literature Review] The Black Lives Matter movement that we discuss in Unit II brings to the fore many of the public debates and controversies that unfold on the streets: the right to protest, the ethics of rioting, abolition, community policing, the persistence of racism, structural inequality, social justice, and civil rights.
Step 1: Drawing on the book that you found in our “Using the Library” activity for inspiration, select a topic in some way related to advancing the scholarly
conversation around BLM.
Step 2: Using the UBC library database, develop a familiarity with other books and articles that seem to address your topic Carefully select at least two
additional scholarly sources (articles or book chapters) that deepen your understanding of your research topic.
Step 3: Use the skills we’ve discussed in class to summarize each article and bring the three perspectives into conversation using the strategies for
orchestrating voices found in AW.
Step 4: Bring a draft of your review to class on Friday, October 21 for a peer review workshop. Your participation in the workshop as a reviewee and a reviewer
will count toward your class participation grade.
Details:
The first part of your literature review should begin by explaining what your research topic is and why it is relevant to BLM. Provide a general introduction to
the research that you’ve conducted and to your findings: what is the state of the field?
The second part of your review should summarize the concepts presented by each scholarly source. Rather than summarizing each author’s argument,
identify major concepts or issues that are addressed by each source and in 1-2 paragraphs per concept, discuss how each author approaches and discusses
that concept.
The third part of your review should return to a survey of the field, and assess its relationship to your research question: highlight gaps in this research; stress
the larger significance of this research to the BLM movement; offer your own comments and/or criticisms of this research; or propose new questions for
future research.

Sample Solution

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pieces of data that can be put away in prompt (present moment) memory, how much data inside every one of those lumps can be very high, without unfavorably influencing the review of similar number

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.