“The Case for De-Extinction”,

In “The Case for De-Extinction”, Stewart Brand argues in favor of continuing scientific effortsto revive certain extinct species. In their response (“The Case Against De-Extinction”), Pauland Anne Ehrlich argues that efforts towards de-extinction are misguided. Do you agree withBrand that de-extinction is a worthwhile project, or with the Ehrlichs that de-extinction is amisguided project? Why or why not? A complete response to these questions will include asummary of Brand’s argument in support of de-extinction, a summary of the Ehrlichs’argument against de-extinction, a clear statement of your own opinion regarding the valueofde-extinction efforts, and an explanation of your reasons for preferring Brand’s positionor the Ehrlichs’ position over the alternative.

In your response, be sure to answer all of the following questions:

● What is de-extinction?

● According to Brand, how does the motivation behind de-extinction relate to themotivation behind more traditional conservation projects?

● According to Brand, why should we think that de-extinction would augment moretraditional conservation efforts?

● According to Brand, how would success in de-extinction transform attitudes towardsnature?

● According to the Ehrlichs, how is de-extinction a distraction from more worthwhileprojects?

● According to the Ehrlichs, why is de-extinction a moral hazard? What is a moral hazard?

● Do you think pursuing de-extinction is a good idea?

○ If you do, why? What do you find unconvincing about the Ehrlichs’ argumentagainst it, and why?

○ If you do not, why? What do you find unconvincing about Brand’s argument, andwhy?

 

Sample Solution

“The Case for De-Extinction”

De-extinction, also called resurrection biology, is the process of resurrecting species that have died out, or gone extinct. The term de-extinction first gained significant public interest in March 2013 thanks to a series of live-streamed talks at the TEDxDeExtinction event, organized by the conservation non-profit organization Revive & Restore and hosted by National Geographic Society. De-extinction was introduced as a means to “undo” historic extinction by restoring new versions of extinct species to their former habitats. A group led by futurist Stewart Brand spearheaded a movement to try to use genetic technology to revive extinct species, such as the woolly mammoth and the passenger pigeon. But why do it? We protect endangered species, conservationists retort (and most of the public agrees), in order to preserve the richest biodiversity we can, to retain creatures that have important ecological roles, or that people love, or as emblems to protect whole endangered ecosystems.

not accountable for the entire business profits as. Managers have goals and should enforce towards accomplishing them with the small available resources. Such managers are said to be strategic managers.

General administration theory in the modern-day management ensures the managers are productive. Government and private sectors recognize the vital need of productivity improvement. Productivity improvement deals with effective performance of the basic non-managerial and managerial activities. Productivity is the output-input ration in a certain period of time with due consideration of equality. Finally, productivity entails efficiency and effectiveness among individuals and organizational operations.

Investigation

Managers are accountable in the taking of actions that ensure the personnel perform maximally to group objectives. Thus, general administration theory in the modern-day management applies to large and small organizations, profit and non-profit enterprises, manufacturing and also to service industries. However, in certain situations there is considerable difference in several levels in organization or in a variety of enterprises. The extent of authority may differ and the kinds of problems being dealt with can be somehow different. All the managers get their outcome by set up an environment for effective group enterprise.

Moreover, all the managers perform their managerial function although time spent for each could be different. That means top-level managers use more time during planning and organizing compared to lower-level managers. On the other hand, leading takes big deal of time for the first line supervisors though the difference of time spent during controlling varies slightly for managers in various levels. Manager is thus, t

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.