The composition of the Security Council

 

In Hurd, the author discusses the composition of the Security Council and how it does not truly represent the current distribution of power in the system. Imagine you are an organizational consultant for the UN and offer your recommendation for a modified Security Council that is both representative and practical. You are free to use any sources you may find for your recommendation.

Sample Solution

Recommendation for a Modified Security Council

The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) is one of the most important organs of the United Nations. It is responsible for maintaining international peace and security, and it has the power to authorize military action. However, the UNSC has been criticized for its composition, which does not truly represent the current distribution of power in the international system.

The UNSC was established in 1945, and its original membership consisted of the five victorious powers of World War II: the United States, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, France, and China. These five countries were given permanent seats on the UNSC, and they also have the power to veto any Security Council resolution.

Over the years, the distribution of power in the international system has changed significantly. The United States and the Soviet Union have both declined in relative power, while China, India, and Brazil have emerged as major powers. However, the UNSC has not been reformed to reflect these changes.

This has led to a situation where the UNSC is not representative of the current distribution of power in the international system. This has made it difficult for the UNSC to take action on some of the most pressing issues facing the world, such as the Syrian Civil War and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

In order to make the UNSC more representative and effective, I recommend the following reforms:

  • Expand the UNSC to include more permanent members. The UNSC should be expanded to include more permanent members, such as India, Brazil, and Japan. These countries are all major powers with a stake in maintaining international peace and security.
  • Give non-permanent members of the UNSC more power. The non-permanent members of the UNSC should be given more power. They should be able to introduce resolutions and veto resolutions, just like the permanent members.
  • Abolish the veto power. The veto power is one of the most controversial aspects of the UNSC. It gives the permanent members a disproportionate amount of power, and it has been used to block action on some of the most important issues facing the world. I recommend that the veto power be abolished.

These reforms would make the UNSC more representative and effective. They would give more countries a voice in the decision-making process, and they would make it more difficult for the permanent members to block action on important issues.

I believe that these reforms are necessary to make the UNSC a more effective instrument for maintaining international peace and security. The UNSC is one of the most important organs of the United Nations, and it is essential that it be reformed to reflect the changing distribution of power in the international system.

In addition to the reforms listed above, I also recommend that the UNSC be more transparent and accountable. The public should have more access to information about the UNSC’s deliberations, and the UNSC should be more accountable to the General Assembly. These reforms would help to build trust and confidence in the UNSC, and they would make it more effective in carrying out its mandate.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.