nomics. This kind of economics holds that free labor should occupy all its income. It is also reasonably based on private ownership and has not developed into the later criticized national economics. Economics holds that man is an animal in pursuit of wealth. “Property” and “life” are almost synonyms in Locke’s philosophy, which is the embodiment of Hobbes’direct inheritance of his thoughts. Hobbes believes that “man is a wolf to man” and that everyone has an attempt to violate other people’s lives and kill others. Locke transformed “homicide” into “property infringement” and moderated “man to man is a wolf”. Locke thinks that people and people are in harmony, but people have the potential to infringe on other people’s property. God created man and made man imperfect. The mistakes that man will make in the field of knowledge may also be made in the field of practice. But just as it is impossible for people not to judge, it is impossible for people to prevent mistakes by not working or by abolishing private ownership. For Locke, private ownership is beyond doubt. Without private ownership, it is unreasonable that labor should possess its income.

In order to prevent the occurrence of errors or to impose reasonable punishment after the event, it is necessary to limit people’s “free will”. Leaving aside Locke’s own discourse on the state of nature, we try to make a new argument for “restricting free will” from our point of view. Locke believes that it is possible for people to restrict their own free will on the premise that family is the typical representative in an environment of undegraded benevolence. “In the early days of the establishment of the government, the number of the state was not much different from that of the family, nor was the number of laws much different from that of the family; since the rulers cared for them for their happiness like their fathers, the rule of the government was almost entirely privileged.” Locke introduced “privilege” here and linked privilege with benevolence. “Privilege is a kind of power to act for the benefit of the public according to discretion without legal provisions, sometimes even in violation of the law.” (The Treatise of Government (Part Two): P102) Kant believes that this kind of rule is absolute. “If a government is based on the principle of benevolence to the people as a father does to his children, that is to say, a father’s government, the subjects here are forced to adopt a passive attitude ju