Review the crisis communication case studies in both the Lachlan and Liberman texts, and read: Always Be Ready: Get Prepared For Your Next PR Crisis (forbes.com)Links to an external site.. (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.)
In the Forbes article, the author relates playing pickleball to preparing and responding to a PR crisis. In at least two brief paragraphs (30 to 50 words each):
1 — Describe a sport or activity that you enjoy and relate it to effective crisis communication preparation/response.
2 — Apply those points to the Wells Fargo case study in the texts and highlight how the organization could have prepared/performed more effectively.
Rock climbing requires meticulous preparation and adaptability. Climbers carefully plan their routes, identify potential hazards, and pack necessary gear. During the climb, unexpected situations arise – loose holds, sudden weather changes. Climbers rely on clear communication with their belayer, quick decision-making, and the ability to adjust their approach to overcome these challenges.
Just like rock climbing, effective crisis communication necessitates preparation. Organizations need to anticipate potential issues, establish clear communication protocols, and have a team ready to respond. During a crisis, agility and clear communication are paramount. Leaders need to assess the situation, adapt messaging, and be transparent with stakeholders to navigate the challenges and rebuild trust.
The Wells Fargo scandal, where employees opened millions of fraudulent accounts, exemplifies a lack of crisis preparedness. Imagine a climber who sets out without checking their equipment or having a backup plan. When the crisis hit, Wells Fargo appeared caught off guard. They could have prepared by fostering a culture of ethical behavior and establishing clear communication channels for employees to report wrongdoing. A more proactive approach to identifying and mitigating potential risks could have prevented the crisis from escalating. During the crisis, Wells Fargo’s delayed and unclear communication eroded public trust. A quicker, more transparent response focused on addressing customer concerns and accountability could have minimized the damage.