The current immigration issue has long historical roots in American society.

 

The current immigration issue has long historical roots in American society. We are all immigrants (based on the Bering Strait theory).Some immigrants have been widely accepted by the U.S. or at worst accepted after a generation. Others have not. First, discuss YOUR roots as you know them (ask your father, mother, grandmother, grandfather)

After discussing your background respond to related questions. What is the common basis for American acceptance and what is common to non acceptance. Why were some groups accepted and others not? Why is the current immigration issue in terms of Latinos such a hot topic and why is it often debated in Congress. The current often discussed issue is focused on Latino young people and children being “the new wave “of immigrants ( which are not wanted) but this issue towards Latinos had long historical roots and does not evolve from just a current perceived “crises”. There is more to this issue. Homeland security is probably not a significant issue as there have been few indications of security threats from the south. Nearly all orange alert related events have pointed to our NORTHERN border. Current Numbers are also not THE primary issue as many Latinos encountered similar “immigration issues” and attempt to “plug” the borders and reduce Latino immigration in past decade. Be logical and thoughtful and complete. Why do many people and officials focus primarily (but not exclusively) on Latinos when we discuss immigration? Our highest percentage increases in immigrants were Anglos (primarily British -many also in a sense were illegal as they did not attempt to obtain the approval of indigenous peoples. Europe was he source of this “uninvited ” migration. ?

Do not rely on the issue of legal and illegal status for though important, it is an issue that has always been present for all groups and is usually now a rationalization not a reason.
DO NOT USE THE PROXIMITY OF MEXICO , CENTRAL AMERICA AND SOUTH AMERICA AS PART OF YOUR ARGUMENTS NOR USE THE INCREASING NUMBERS OF LATINOS These ideas do play a role but they are far too simplistic. You need to think and develop more complete discussions.

Let me state once again. Do not use the issue of illegal or illegal as part of your discussion at all. The first settlers to American were ILLEGAL. ( That means the settlers at Jamestown and Plymouth Rock) Ask the Native Americans. The European settlers ( primarily British at the beginning) were not invited nor did they try to assimilate to the tribes in which they found themselves. They did not obey the Native American “laws” either. I want you to reach beyond this every simple argument to other ideas. It simply does not adequately explain the passion or focus of many.

Let me also dispel some other “common sense myths”. Latino immigrants do pay taxes and they pay in far greater amounts (value) then other people (non immigrants) of similar income levels pay. . They receive social services (health, welfare) fairly equal in value or less than other groups in their income categories.. They have added enormous value to and even provided the foundation for the continued low pricing of agricultural products and also housing and business construction. Without this labor pool, it is fairly unanimously agreed that the prices of these goods and other services would be very high. (2-3 times higher). One of the major reasons that immigrants have increased in North America recently is due to NAFTA ( a Free trade agreement) which had destructive impact on Mexico and in some ways benefited United States more than any other participant.

It is true that the Heritage Foundation ( a very conservative think tank) and Lou Dobbs ( a likable but not seriously SCHOLARLY qualified TV commentator) would support these “myths” but the overwhelming body of research and studies conducted by very reputable research organizations does not support these “myths”. They are just that- myths. So reach beyond those ideas also when discussing this issue.

 

 

Sample Solution

The administration at this point is perhaps the best shortcoming of the party. Regardless of Mr. Trudeau contacting youthful crowds more than ever, he has additionally accompanied a consistently low endorsement rating. Exactly how low? “Mr Trudeau’s own endorsement rating is lower than U.S. President Donald Trump’s.” (Margaret Wente, 2019) Recent surveys show just 35% of Canadians support the Trudeau government. (Margaret Wente, 2019) This is somewhat equivalent to the rate who endorsed Harper’s administration back in 2014. (Margaret Wente, 2019) Many Canadians feel the main problems are not being tended to, and the cash is being squandered on silly bills and goals. For instance, Bill C-69, which states project parts presently need to consider “the crossing point of sex and orientation with other character factors.” (Margaret Wente, 2019) This obviously has nothing connected with siphoning oil and is squandering assets focussing on issues that won’t help Canadians. (Margaret Wente, 2019) The liberal party winds up in the center of the political range, which can enjoy its benefits and disservices. The liberal party needs to assist with halting environmental change, but have executed a carbon charge that is too low to even consider impacting Canadians conduct, however sufficiently high to bother individuals. (Margaret Wente, 2019) There has been not many debates and outrages during head of the state trudeau’s initiative. Be that as it may, the current and generally huge of the couple of being the current on going SNC-Lavalin Construction Inc examination. The outrage is progressing as of March 2019 and will hurt the Liberals in the impending political race. The organization SNC-Lavalin Construction Inc had been accused of misrepresentation and debasement. (Staff, N. P, 2019) If sentenced the organization might be restricted from chipping away at government contracts for a considerable length of time. (Staff, N. P, 2019) In 2016, soon after the political race, the organization started have gatherings with the Minister of Public Services and Procurement, Carla Qualtrough, as well as authorities in the Prime Minister’s Office to endeavor to change regulation rapidly to stay away from the punishments confronting the organization. (Staff, N. P, 2019) The Prime Minister’s Office then, at that point, improperly compelled the Attorney General Jody Wilson-Raybould to intercede in continuous criminal official actions against SNC-Lavalin and leave arraignment. (Staff, N. P, 2019) Prime Minister Trudeau emerged with an assertion saying this never occurred and afterward Jody Wilson-Raybould sus

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.