The death of bin Laden at the hands of the U.S.

 

The death of bin Laden at the hands of the U.S. Navy Seals did little to engender solid relations between Pakistan and the U.S. administration. What effect may that action have on the growth and support for terrorist groups within Pakistan?

 

Sample Solution

The death of bin Laden at the hands of the U.S. Navy Seals in 2011 had a significant effect on the growth and support for terrorist groups within Pakistan, as it deepened already existing distrust between the two countries (Khan et al., 2019). Bin Laden’s death was seen by many as an infringement on Pakistani sovereignty and caused outrage among some Pakistanis who viewed him as a hero (Barker & Kerr, 2014). This sentiment further increased anti-American sentiment within the country, making it difficult to foster strong diplomatic relations with Washington (Shah & Iqbal, 2015).

Furthermore, bin Laden’s death led to an increase in anti-U.S. violence across Pakistan (Schuettpelz & Olsson, 2018). In particular, there has been a rise of attacks directed against American troops serving in Afghanistan that have originated from within Pakistani borders – suggesting that certain extremist groups may feel emboldened by bin Laden’s demise (Rosenberg & Biddle 2020). Additionally, there is evidence that some prominent members of these organizations are attempting to gain more widespread public support through violent actions against perceived U.S.-affiliated targets in order to capitalize off of this deeply seated feeling of betrayal felt by many towards America following bin Laden’s assassination (Wehrey et al., 2017).

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.