when people turn out and turn everything against them in their favor. That is what a smart person can do here. In line with the studies of Mole Wijk, Kleinlugtenbelt and Widdershoven (2011), every individual should, at the beginning of any discussion, express their feelings and emotions. It can be elaborating what they are going through, their substantial effects on themselves and how it might affect the work environment. This is where the heat of being introvert is pushed out by applying extrovert personality. It is necessary and important to notice the emotional which might be in the way of making decision ethical. (Molewijk, Kleinlugtenbelt, and Widdershoven, 2011) have described an Aristotelian conversation method which helps one confront their emotional state of mind. This includes five steps and it helps individuals in elaborating what is it to be a proficient professional in their field and to open up about the perceptions, judgments & anything like halo-effect. I feel this is very effective in helping one manage emotions and vent it out while not suppressing it, in turn, affect their moral and ethical decisions.
Let us now examine a chart which describes the ethical work among students from the military. As described above, work has been categorized as is subject to be relative. In the search engine company, a worker might have the freedom and independence as a part of his moral code and might apply to the ethics for that particular field of interest. However, this varies. The graph below shows that hard work stands first, followed by non-leisure, asceticism followed by independence at the end. Thus, the work ethic is very contextual.
“Our society would have fewer problems if people had less leisure time” (Townsend & Thompson, 2014).
This might not intend to mean, in any way that a person should not relish, but rather focuses on having a proper percentage of time one allows to subjective matter in their own field of work. The whole topic of work ethic is thus very relative and might differ in the case of a white-collar job office environment, to something that is at a live construction site versus a set up for students and might be totally unlike with those in the army.
In one way or another, every working person will be a part of a team or group that may be a count of two or more. However, it doesn’t mean every group will work together and can be considered as a team. Usually, groups in the working environment will be two or more individuals who are not depending on other and will communicate when it’s necessary or over the time, for example, let’s say in a restaurant we see more than 3 or 4 people will be serving different tables depending on the size of the place and we can consider them as a group. They only interact with each other when it’s necessary or when the customer asks for anything, they do not depend on other waiters to do work but together they will work for running the restaurant successfully. Groups do not have a vivid plan of action so conflict is very common like waiting for the table in the non-assigned area like that.
Teams, on the other hand, can be considered as a special group of people who has a different set of skills and each person can do a specific part of the same project and others team members will do their specified tasks in that project. We can differentiate the teams and groups by another way like te
