The Economics of Happiness,Helena Norberg-Hodge

at
Categories
Tags

1. In the opening of The Economics of Happiness, Helena Norberg-Hodge emphasizes the importance of a sense of belonging and community interdependence to psychological well being in traditional Ladakhi culture. How does this relate to sustainability?

2. Traditional/land-based cultures such as Ladakh’s are often considered “backward” and “impoverished” because per capita income is usually very low. What do such assessments leave out? What might be some of the consequences of trying to “improve” such cultures?

3. Name the three causes of “over shoot” and discuss why the authors of Limits to Growth are pessimistic that this problem can be corrected

Sample Solution

In “Economics of Happiness”, Helena Norberg-Hodge bemoans the potential demise of an authentic culture to the rigors of economic development. Remarkably, embedded in the ensuing turmoil is priceless insight into the impact of globalization on local communities: the transmission of feelings of “inadequacy” and “inferiority” which bequeaths a consumer culture upon the community (Norberg-Hodge, 2010). Inferentially, consumer culture has the potential to destroy the local economy as it promotes dependence on foreign goods and services. Consumer culture is not sustainable, as the capacity of posterity to meet future needs is

The understanding of authority shifts on what various people accept is a genuine pioneer. Despite the fact that, with all the various clarifications on what a pioneer is, it is difficult to advocate what a genuine pioneer is. Steven M. Smith states, “Administration is the capacity to adjust the setting so everybody feels enabled to contribute imaginatively to taking care of the issues.” But in my conviction authority is progressively perplexing. Right now will addressing the points: pioneers and supervisors the equivalent? Are pioneers conceived or made? How an individual turns into a ‘pioneer’? What’s more, finally the thinking to why Malala Yousafzai is a prime case of a pioneer in the twenty first century.

A pioneer has numerous apparatuses and abilities, a pioneer is one that gives orders yet can tune in simultaneously. Pioneers are contrasted with supervisors a great deal as in the two of them neglect individuals. A fundamental job of a pioneer is to move and impact laborers anyway an administrator’s job is to explain objectives and plan gatherings. An administrator anticipates achieving his objectives, yet pioneers anticipate what’s to come. Pioneers make a dream, supervisors make objectives. Next, another far from being obviously true theme is whether individuals are conceived pioneers or made pioneers. My conviction is that pioneers are made not conceived. Authority comprises of aptitudes that can be received. This is demonstrated by an investigation, as per the educators from the college of Illinois, “Just 30 percent of administration characteristics are in hereditary qualities.” Also, some that somebody can do to help get the characteristics of a pioneer is figuring out how to ready to break through to individuals and be a good example that will make them need to proceed to work more earnestly.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer