The Exclusionary Rule.

at
Categories
Tags

 

 

 

The concept of the Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine stems directly from the Exclusionary Rule. It is a method of explaining the concept of the Exclusionary Rule. It compares the Exclusionary Rule to a Tree that is poisonous and all of the fruit from that tree is also poison. The tree represents actions by law enforcement that are not appropriate and violate the 4th Amendment. Any fruit, which represents the evidence seized as a result of inappropriate actions by authorities is considered “poisonous” and not admissible in the court proceeding.

 

Describe the Exclusionary Rule and how it is meant to protect citizens of this country.
Identify at least 2 methods of demonstrative evidence that would explain the concept of best evidence. You may use scenarios to describe the theory of best evidence.
Explain the need for an absolute adherence to avoiding any evidentiary issue that would result in a Fruit of the Poisonous Tree violation (4th Amendment).
Explain the court’s displeasure with issues like the Christian Burial Speech. What might it mean in the long run to a serious case just as it did with Brewer v. Williams?

Sample Solution

The Exclusionary Rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the Exclusionary Rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. If evidence that falls within the scope of the exclusionary rule led law enforcement to other evidence, which they would not otherwise have located, then the Exclusionary Rule applies to the newly discovered evidence, subject to a few exceptions. The secondarily excluded evidence is called “fruit of the poisonous tree.” Though the rationale behind the Exclusionary Rule is based in constitutional rights, it is a court-created remedy and deterrent, not an independent constitutional right.

 

 

Hamlet and Revenge

Hamlet and retribution of vengeance have made numerous individuals breakdown. The idea of its utilization drives individuals to act deceitfully through annoyance as opposed to reason. Vengeance is simple sensible feeling; one turn merits another round. In any case, this is a risky hypothesis. Vengeance is the primary topic in Hamlet. Fortinbras, Laertes, and Hamlet are looking for vengeance for their dad’s demise. In any case, thusly, every one of the three individuals rely upon feeling as opposed to suspecting and make an extremely large wager.

Hamlet and retribution are hopeless organizations attempting vengeance and those looking for retribution (Hamlet) inevitably face demise after the wrongdoing. History of misfortune of retribution Prosser’s view on Hamlet’s vengeance “Saints are asked to fight back, as most misfortunes of retaliation, casualties or wrongdoings are legitimately identified with the hero” (Prosser) of retribution The impacts of misfortune incorporate Julius Caesar, Macbeth and Andronis. In Shakespeare ‘s paper by Shakespeare, Shakespeare centers around vengeance and builds up the idea of death in the play. What is the awfulness of the retribution of the Elizabethan time? This is a misfortune, its thought process is vengeance, and its fundamental plot incorporates the procedure of counter. The awfulness of retribution in the long run prompted the passing of the killer and the Avengers himself. In misfortune of vengeance, we need three letters.

Shakespeare’s “Hamlet” shows the overall components found in the awfulness of the vengeance of the renaissance (“misfortune of retribution”). Be that as it may, despite the fact that Hamlet is a misfortune of retribution, Shakespeare convolutes the fundamental vengeance plot by making three retribution plots. By including significant developments, Shakespeare makes ‘Ship of the Concentric Revenge Miwa’ (Frye 90) which is certainly not a physical legend yet an apparition, not a phantom, yet a scholarly saint who is an issue. did. viewpoint

In Shakespeare’s ‘Hamlet’ retribution, Shakespeare vindicated as the subject of the considerable number of works. Retribution assumes a significant job in the improvement of Fortinbras, Prince of Norway, Hamlet, the Prince of Denmark, and the child of Polonius Laertes. Each of the three requested vengeance for their dad’s homicide. In Hamlet, vengeance can be deciphered as another character. Everybody looking for vengeance will defeat it. To begin with, after each murder every child has a reasonable activity plan.

 

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer