“The Fireman”

 

1) “The Fireman” employs motif in a manner that builds to theme and meaning. In the same way that the main character in the story uses firefighting as a second job, the story uses fire as an image that repeats throughout the story. This provides the story with unity and theme, but it’s also like a hunt for clues, or a scavenger hunt. Read this story closely, especially pages 13-17.

2) Next, watch my brief video (video is close-captioned) analyzing a portion of the story.

3) Go through the story, especially pages 13-17, and find four key points in the text where fire, smoke, a place on fire, or something specific to firefighting is described. Identify these portions of the text on your worksheet and explain how they a) discuss some larger concept, or truth, about fire or firefighting but also b) connect to or stand in for a more abstract idea about relationships.

4) Look at the four key points from the text all together and see if they are meant to say something surprising about love, marriage, and/or relationships.

Sample Solution

Cities are being struck one by one by a horrific new plague. Dragonscale is a highly contagious, fatal spore that leaves gorgeous black and gold patterns all over its victims’ bodies before causing them to erupt in flames. Thousands of people have been afflicted, and fires have erupted all over the place. There is no way to stop it. There is no one who is safe.
Before her hospital burned down, Harper Grayson, a dedicated nurse, treated hundreds of diseased patients. She’s now noticed the distinctive gold-flecked marks on her skin. When the outbreak first began, she and her husband, Jakob, made a deal: if they become sick, they would take matters into their own hands.

ases. Act utility would give room for individuals to determine the best action.

A rule based system leads to greater overall utility because people are capable of having bad judgement. Having specific rules to follow maximizes utility by not relying on the drivers’ judgments that could possibly endanger others or themselves too. For instance, based on an individual drivers’ judgements not following the road stop signs over some emergency could endanger many. The stop sign would distinctly set the rule and tell drivers to stop and does not allow them to calculate whether it would be better to stop or not.

Rule consequentialism avoids criticisms of act consequentialism. According to critics, act consequentialism approves of actions that can be wrong, undermine justice, undermine basic trust among people, and its demanding because it requires people to make sacrifices.

Rule consequentialists avoids underming trust because they do not evaluate individual actions separately and instead support rules that maximize utility.

Many of the rules would maximize utility. For example, rules that clearly distinguish the right and wrong in medical practice where doctors would clearly not be allowed to use one healthy patients organs to save five other patient lives, even if saving five patients results in maximum good. Else no one would trust doctors or the benefits of medical treatment.

In defence of rule utility, Brak Hooker pointed out the different contexts in which the role of partiality and impartiality can be applied. Justification of moral rules has to be impartial. When deciding which rules to apply its important to consider the impact of the rule and gauge the interests of people involved.

The applicability of partial concerns with the what are the rules and how they should be applied in real cases. For example, partiality in cases where caregiving for children is concerned, even rule utility would give room to this. It would be justified to prioritise your own childrens emotional well being over your adult relatives because children are clearly the responsibility of their parents. This kind of par

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.