The greatest barriers preventing our schools from meeting the educational goals

W​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​hat are some of the greatest barriers preventing our schools from meeting the educational goals for ELL students today? What recommendations are offered in your readings that address these barriers? Whom do you see as potential change agents for implementing these recommendations?

Sample Solution

The greatest barriers preventing our schools from meeting the educational goals

For those whose primary language is anything but English, the road to reaching fluency in the latter is anything but smooth. Barriers, such as lack of parent engagement, teacher experience, and language proficiency, have been shown to limit the success of English Language Learners (ELL) students and are frequently dissected in the existing professional research. Scholars agree that parent engagement is a challenge with ELL students because of varying cultural beliefs and expectations (Copeland, 2007; De Jong & Harper, 2005; Shim, 2013; Vera et al., 2012). In order to build cultural awareness and understanding, district-wide professional development methods are necessary to increase ELL success (Batt, 2008). Collaboration can also be used to improve language proficiency by strategically designing grouping configuration (Holmes, 2010). For instance, pairing a culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD) student with a more proficient English speaker often supports the CLD students in more fully participating in the understanding.

workers with different skills has outweighed the supply of said workers causing disparity in the highest of earners to the lowest earners whilst increasing their bargaining power also.

Labour market deregulation is implemented to attain economies of scale, that is increase productivity whilst reducing average unit labour cost. In turn they increase the efficiency of the firms and they are able to expand and allocate resources more efficiently specifically important if they are multinational. By lowering wages and increasing insecurity removing legislation, there is a clear lower labour cost which can result in substitution of labour for capital, dropping capital intensity which harms labour productivity growth but enhances capital growth. Labour market deregulation reforms was implemented in Europe as part of a strategy that would close the gap between U.S. in terms of Foreign Direct Investment implemented abroad, what we can note is that over a steady period of time we have seen a massive improvement of European Union relative to the US. According to OECD (2019), in 2017, US GDP per capita and productivity levels are at $17,348,625.8 compared to EU’s at $18,568,705.8, within the EU following the US model of mainly deregulated markets has seen a substantial change over the years in the GDP.

Overall, considering the basis of the examination of research, it can be argued that the deregulation of the labour market resulted in improved productivity and performance citing examples in the EU. We must note that the deregulation of labour markets involved the removing of institutions and minimal internal and external intervention. Over a sustained period of time, economies of scale has allowed firms to become more efficient in terms of allocating resources in segments of the firm that need it but even more so which defines labour market deregulation, the ability for firms to align themselves according to the elasticity of demand of the market to streamline which has improved organisations overall productivity and performance.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.