The identified framework is Orem’s self-care deficit theory

at
Categories
Tags

 

The identified framework is Orem’s self-care deficit theory. This theory helps assists nurses to discover which sides of the patient care they need to target in a particular circumstance, and it emphasizes the importance of maintaining their patients’ independence on self-care activities (Regis College, n.d.). Orem’s self-care deficit theory proposes that maintaining some independence in own health care is beneficial to promote health (Regis College, n.d.). Thus, in accordance with this theory, the goal of nursing is to assist patients to reach their maximum level of independence.

Not only physical limitation but also inadequate knowledge can be the reason for self-care deficits. Physical limitation can be addressed by supportive or medical interventions that can promote independence. Inadequate knowledge and lack of health information can be another barrier to self-care activities, and patient education can be an effective nursing intervention to promote patient knowledge. After all, patient education is one of the most important aspects of nursing services.

The application of patient education can be easily found in all nursing fields. An example of this application is outpatient dialysis. An effective and appropriate educational program in the disease process and hemodialysis can reduce the treatment nonadherence in hemodialysis patients. Concept A is an effective and appropriate educational program in the disease process and hemodialysis, and concept B is the treatment nonadherence in hemodialysis patients. The proposition is “can reduce” which ties together two concepts.

According to Alikari et al. (2021), patient knowledge has a significant impact on treatment adherence. Patient knowledge can be promoted by an effective and appropriate patient education program. The treatment nonadherence in hemodialysis patients is measured by the number of missed treatments in one month period and three consecutive months period in an outpatient dialysis setting. Inkeroinen et al. (2021) stated that patient education promotes treatment adherence of chronic kidney patients, however, patient knowledge of their own medical condition is typically inadequate. As such, hemodialysis patients need to be regularly reeducated on how to adequately address the complex dynamics of their condition.

 

DISCUSSION POST # Betsy

The theory identified, “knowledge as a component of the socio-cultural orientation basic conditioning factor enhances the prevention of hazards,” is based on Orem’s self-care deficit theory. Dorothea E. Orem conceptualized the theory, and it has various assumptions that can aid in promoting optimal care among patients (Petiprin, 2022). According to Yip (2021), many researchers have commended Orem’s self-care deficit nursing theory, especially since it aids in improving patients’ health outcomes through nurses’ contributions. In Orem’s theory, it explains the phrases self-care, self-care deficit, and nursing systems, which are essential in the nursing profession. While the theory impacts each of the patients’ independence, self-care cannot be carried out on individuals that desire entire care or assistance with self-care activities inclusive of babies and the aged. An example of the application of the theory in nursing practice is; educating the patient and family on call bell systems can enable patients to seek assistance before changing the position to protect themselves from fall or injury, thereby preventing hazards. Falls can lead to pain in patients and especially among the elderly as such, educating the patients about the call bell system can greatly reduce incidents of falls.

 

Sample Solution

ee with Oberdorfer that Gorbachev is an important factor that led to the end of the Cold War because if he wasn’t in charge, things would have most likely carried out in the same manner as before. For example, the Soviet Economy would have fallen drastically even faster than it fell under his leadership, thus the big impact Gorbachev had through managing the economy in a better way than others, creating or enforcing relationships with leaders such as Reagan and being more active than previous members changed the outcome of the Cold War. After the demise of the previous leader, Chernenko, Reagan sent his vice president, Bush to the funeral to meet Gorbachev, the new leader who was going to induce “serious change” to the Soviet Union, and bring it out of “its long time troubles”. This positive perception did not become reality because of the breakup of the Soviet Union and the loss of power and control over the Eastern European countries, hence why we cannot ignore the vast importance of Eastern European countries gaining independence as the main cause of the end of the Cold War. Gorbachev’s leadership was not inadequate but, Levesque argues, when he needed to focus on the Eastern countries, he did the exact opposite and focused on the West. Moreover, he offered no financial support to those who wanted change in the Eastern European countries since the Soviet Union’s economy was rapidly declining as evident in the Soviets increased the price of oil exports. Therefore, it is quite apparent that the Cold War ended as a result of the lack of control the Soviet Union had over Eastern European countries.
Comparison:
Levesque has the most valid interpretation because the breadth of it is larger than Oberdorfer’s and Pemberton’s interpretations. Levesque ultimately argues that the Cold War’s end was a result of the Soviet Union’s sheer lack of control of Eastern European countries. His argument is articulate in exploring the reason of the end of the Cold War as well as exploring other contributing factors such as the Soviet economy and how its status was slowly dissolving the Soviet diplomacy and the impact of the Afghanistan War on them, which is further explored by Reuveny and Prakash. Therefore, Levesque’s interpretation is considered objective as he takes a holistic approach in viewing the majority of the factors that contributed to the end of the Cold War, then pinpoints the most impactful one- the lack of control of Eastern European countries and their attainment of independence. Similarly to Levesque’s interpretation, Pemberton and Oberdorfer touch on the Sov

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.
Hi, how can I help?