The Impact of Climate Change on Food Security

 

 

 

 

The United Nations (UN) has hired you as a consultant, and your task is to assess the impact that global warming is expected to have on population growth and the ability of societies in the developing world to ensure the adequate security of their food supplies.

Case Assessment
As the world’s population nears 10 billion by 2050, the effects of global warming are stripping some natural resources from the environment. As they diminish in number, developing countries will face mounting obstacles to improving the livelihoods of their citizens and stabilizing their access to enough food. The reason these governments are struggling even now is that our climate influences their economic health and the consequent diminishing living standards of their peoples. Climate changes are responsible for the current loss of biodiversity as well as the physical access to some critical farming regions. As such, these changes in global weather patterns diminish agricultural output and the distribution of food to local and international markets. These difficulties will become even more significant for these countries as the Earth’s climate changes for the worse. Temperatures are already increasing incrementally, and polar ice caps are melting, so the salient question is: what does this suggest for developing societies?The issue before the developing world is not its lack of food, but rather how to gain access to food. Simply put, changes in our climate are affecting the global food chain, and hence, the living standards of entire populations. Added to this is the fact that food is not getting to where it is needed in time to prevent hunger or starvation. In many developing countries, shortages are due to governments’ control over distribution networks rather than an insufficient supply of food itself. In effect, these governments are weaponizing food by favoring certain ethnic or religious groups over others. When added to dramatic climate changes that we are experiencing even now, the future for billions of poor people looks increasingly dim.

Instructions
You are to write a minimum of a 5 page persuasive paper for the UN that addresses the following questions about the relationship between atmospheric weather patterns and food security in the developing world:

Climate change and global warming are often used interchangeably, but they are not the same phenomenon. What are the differences between the two concepts and what leads to the confusion between them?
In 1900, the average global temperature was about 13.7° Celsius (56.7° Fahrenheit) (Osborn, 2021), but as of 2020, the temperature has risen another 1.2°C to 14.9°C (58.9°F). According to the Earth and climate science community, if the Earth’s surface temperature rises another 2°C (3.6°F), we will suffer catastrophic weather patterns that, among other things, will raise sea levels, cause widespread droughts and wildfires, result in plant, insect, and animal extinctions, and reduce agricultural productivity throughout the world (Mastroianni, 2015 and Lindsey & Dahlman, 2020). How much credibility do you place in these projections? Why?
There is no question that the Earth’s food sources are threatened by changes in its weather patterns, but what specific challenges does climate change pose to the food security of people in the developing world?
There is currently a debate among some multinational lending agencies like the International Monetary Fund, UNICEF, and AID over the financial support for food security has been misused by recipient government officials. On the other hand, U.S. authorities insist that misuse of its assistance is not occurring because it has strict monitoring oversight in place. What is your position on this matter? Is there evidence that financial assistance to developing governments is being widely misused by government officials?

Sample Solution

is exposition I will talk about the associations between authority, inspiration and cooperation hypotheses, how they interface with training in associations and their limits, offering arrangements where difficulties emerge. The exposition plans to make inferences on the reasonableness of Fiedler’s Contingency Theory of Leadership, Tuckman’s Model of Group Development, Belbin’s Team Theory, and Herzberg’s Two Factor Theory practically speaking, and how intricacies like power and impact shape how they can be applied to best suit what is going on a pioneer faces.

Initiative Contingency based speculations of authority propose that there is no right or most ideal way to lead a gathering, or association, because of the critical number of limitations on a circumstance (Flinsch-Rodriguez, 2019). Fiedler, in his Contingency Theory of Leadership (Fiedler, 1967), proposes that the viability of a gathering is reliant upon the authority styles of the pioneer and their favourability to everything going on. A significant part of the hypothesis is laid out around the most un-favored associate scale (LPC). The LPC expects to measure a potential chiefs way to deal with an errand on a size of relationship persuaded to task roused, where the pioneer fits on the scale permits what is going on to be derived, and accordingly permits the recognizable proof of reasonable pioneers for assignments. The favourableness of the present circumstance relies upon three attributes: pioneer part relations, the help and trust the pioneer as from the gathering; task structure, the lucidity of the assignment to the pioneer; and positional power, the power the pioneer needs to survey a gatherings execution and give prizes and disciplines (Fiedler, 1967). In the event that the pioneers approach matches what is expected from going on, achievement is anticipated for the gathering. Fiedler’s possibility model offers an extremely stark categorisation of authority, obviously characterizing which circumstances endlessly won’t bring about progress for a likely pioneer. At the senior administration level of a hierarchal construction inside an association the hypothesis can be applied openly, right off the bat because of the simplicity at which people can be supplanted on the off chance that their LPC score doesn’t match that expected of everything going on (Pettinger, 2007). Furthermore, and above all, is to guarantee that the senior administration are ideally suited to effectively lead the association. In any case, further down the ordered progression Fielder’s possibility hypothesis starts to hold considerably less pertinence, it becomes unfeasible according to a hierarchical point of view because of the quantity of individuals at this degree of authority. The planned operations of coordinating the pioneer with their most un-favored collaborator is difficult to reliably accomplish, so a more continuum based approach is required. Figure 1: Chelladurai’s Multi-Dimensional Model of Leadership (Miller and Cronin, 2012)

There are other possibility speculations that give a more continuum based approach like Redding’s hypothesis of administration and the board, but Fielder’s depiction of how situational factors influence the authority style expected for everything going on is very valuable in figuring out the essentials of initiative (Pettinger, 2007). Chelladurai in his Multi Dimensional Model of Leadership, develops a lot of Fiedler’s hypothesis however in a continuum based approach, in which the pioneer can adjust their administration style to fit everything going on (Chelladurai and Madella, 2006). Chelladurai’s hypothesis is taken from sports psycholo

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.