The ineffectiveness of gun control

 

 

Talk about how more gun control does not work and how it hinders Americans from defending themselves

Sample Solution

The idea of gun control is a controversial issue in the United States and has been for many years. The main argument proposed by those who are in favor of more stringent laws on firearms, is that it will reduce the number of shootings occurring across the nation. However, research conducted by Harvard Injury Control Research Center has revealed that stricter gun-control laws have not been shown to significantly reduce firearm-related violence (Webster et al., 2017). Studies have also found that states with more lenient gun regulations tend to experience fewer mass shootings than those with tighter restrictions (Kivisto & Rizzo, 2018). Further evidence suggests that new gun control measures could prevent Americans from being able to effectively defend themselves against criminals, as 80% of defensive gun use involves simply brandishing a weapon rather than actually discharging it (Cook & Ludwig, 2006).

Proponents of expanded regulations argue that they would help protect citizens from violent attacks; however this overlooks the fact that law abiding citizens can be effective deterrents when armed. A study examining data from over 2,000 cases found that almost 98% of attempted robberies were foiled when victims used guns in self defense (Tark et al., 2019). This indicates how firearms can serve an important role in protecting people’s lives and property without having to resort to lethal force. Furthermore, surveys conducted by several organizations indicate an overwhelming majority oppose additional controls on firearms ownership (Romero & Deshmukh-Ranadive, 2018). Despite this opposition, some lawmakers remain determined to pass stricter regulations which would only further limit people’s ability to protect themselves against criminals or other threats.

In conclusion, more restrictive legislation on guns does not seem like an effective solution for reducing violence or protecting citizens from attack. In fact current research shows quite the opposite – there is evidence suggesting increased regulation may lead to higher crime rates and impede individuals’ right to defend themselves against potential aggressors. Therefore policymakers should focus their efforts elsewhere when attempting to address America’s issues with firearm related violence instead of infringing upon its citizens Second Amendment rights.

Section I: INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY Introduction The country is encountering a basic deficiency of medical care suppliers, a lack that is supposed to increment in the following five years, similarly as the biggest populace in our country’s set of experiences arrives at the age when expanded clinical consideration is vital (Pike, 2002). Staffing of emergency clinics, facilities, and nursing homes is more basic than any time in recent memory as the huge quantities of ‘gen X-ers’ start to understand the requirement for more continuous clinical mediation and long haul care. Interest in turning into a medical caretaker has disappeared lately, likely because of the historical backdrop of the extraordinary and requesting instructive cycle, low compensation, firm and extended periods of time, and fast ‘wear out’ of those rehearsing in the calling (Wharrad, 2003).

A complex oversaw care climate in this country is restricting the dollars accessible to be spent on nursing care. Numerous wellbeing callings, particularly nursing, have the standing of ‘eating their young’ as opposed to offering compelling coaching to develop future medical services suppliers. Because of these variables, the quantity of medical attendants has diminished and businesses regard themselves as understaffed and seeking able work force. Before 2001 the decay had been apparent for a considerable length of time (Sadler, 2003). Nursing schools, public pioneers, medical services pioneers and the overall population is impacted by the absence of Registered Nurses (RNs) accessible.

As the populace ages, the assumption is that a rising number of RNs will be required essentially to keep up with the ongoing degree of medical care. Furthermore, the momentum ecological and political worries of expanding pandemic sickness, event of synthetic and catastrophic events, and expanding dangers of war, requires critical expansions in the medical services labor force (Jefferys, 2001). The public nursing lack and factors that increment the interest for expanding the nursing labor force notwithstanding public, state, and nearby debacles make the potential for a general wellbeing emergency. Nursing programs have endeavored to satisfy need for medical attendants by expanding enlistment and campaigning effectively for expansions in program subsidizing by schools and states for understudies.

Tragically, the issue of nursing understudy weakening hampers the best endeavors of nursing programs and irritates the public lack of Registered Nurses in the United States (Ofori, 2002). In 2003, the National League for Nursing revealed a positive vertical pattern in the nursing labor force supply in any case, the American College of Healthcare Executives (2006) detailed that in 2005, 85% of emergency clinic directors decided medical clinics needed more enlisted medical attendants to fulfill patient consideration needs. The United States Bureau of Labor insights showed by 2014, more than 1.2 million new and substitution nursing positions would be expected to meet the public medical services needs (Ramsburg, 2007).

Various broad endeavors to diminish weakening have been made by nursing programs including reinforcing affirmation methods and executing maintenance programs. Unfortunately, the issues of weakening keep on continuing nursing schools the nation over. Admission to a nursing program is serious and numerous potential understudies are denied confirmation every semester. Steady loss from nursing programs influences not just the particular understudy who is acknowledged to a nursing program and ineffective, yet in addition the understudy denied confirmation that might have been effective. Steady loss rates are expensive to understudies, nursing projects, and medical services the same by diminishing the quantity of likely alumni from schools of nursing and adding to the nursing lack. Many examinations feature the a lot higher than wanted whittling down rates for nursing understudies

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.