Email the paper to me as a Word Doc file, with the file named in this format: your_name_final_essay_intro-modernism
Make sure that your name is on the paper and that it also includes a title.
If you are going to use lots of images you are welcome to send me the paper in another file format, as well, that better represents how you would like it to look (life a pdf), but still include the word doc file too.
From the syllabus:
“Students will produce a final essay of approximately 1500 -1800 words in which they write the “Introduction” for, and curate, a Modernist Exhibition around a specific theme. Students will be required to use external sources.”
In this paper you will be writing the equivalent of the “Introduction” to the catalog for a modernist exhibition that you curate at a hypothetical (or real) museum or art space. However here there are no financial or institutional limits to what you can include. Examples of exhibition catalogs are posted in Week 14 of the DotEd page.
At a minimum this paper should include:
– A Title –
– An Introduction –
– What is the theme?
– Argument about why this theme is significant in relation to modernist arts (i.e. why is the viewer here)?
– The main body of the Paper –
– Discussion of the works that the viewer will see (and they can include non-visual works, like novels, since this is a conceptual show).
– There is no specific number of works that you have to discuss, but you should discuss at least a few.
– Articulate how these individual works are connected to the exhibition theme
– A Conclusion –
In general the paper will require you to:
1) articulate a claim: For example, why do these things go together, what is the central idea/narrative? What does this narrative differ from other modernist narratives?
2) It will also require you to write in detail about specific pieces of art, films, texts – how are they connected to your exhibition’s central claim/narrative and how are they connected to the central ideas/narratives of the course?
3) What is the motive of the exhibition? Why should anyone go to it or read it? What are the stakes? In what ways does accepting your claim/narrative help the audience understand something new about “modernism?” Why is it not just interesting but important?
This is what I’ll be looking for you to articulate and write about when I grade your papers.
With these papers I don’t want to overly define in advance what you should write. There will be ample time in class and outside of class to discuss what your paper will be about. However, a few general examples: 1) A version of the Modernist Exhibition in which you use materials we’ve already looked at in class but create your own theme with/through them; 2) A Modernist Exhibition in which you use some of the course materials but bring in materials we haven’t discussed, of which there are many. Do not write on a contemporary piece of art and not discuss it’s relation to the course. I want to see that you’ve been thinking about our class discussions.
You will be required to cite sources, and especially outside sources if you’re using things that are not class assigned materials. Do not plagiarize! If in doubt, cite! You may ask me about this if you’re uncertain. There is not a specific citation system that you have to use, but it needs to be consistent. Consult this website: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/resources.html
You can/should include images, sketches, etc. But they do not replace the word count.
LATE Papers will be reduced 1/3 of a Letter Grade the first day, and a full grade for each subsequent late day.
Finally, have fun, experiment, and do something that you find interesting since that will make it more interesting for your audience.
Plato’s Communism
First class: Elites are not masses, they command all social orders, yet their inclinations help them. As indicated by Mr. Madison and Mr. Platon, groups take care of this issue in two distinct manners. Plato saw natural blemishes in two urban communities of society, affluent urban communities and helpless urban communities. He believes that “Outright force is completely degenerate”, he dismisses inadequacy since he is viewing the framework lacking individuals who got appropriate training in the custom of Plutonia. Inherent savagery
This awesome city is the connection between Plato’s ideal nation and its human spirit, and its perspectives on the four excellencies. The human spirit is an extended variant of the Platon people group. Accordingly, all the ideals of Plato partner them with the city and apply it to the human spirit for a bigger scope. The accompanying papers talk about different parts of the spirit and the interrelationship between them. I will talk about how Plato applied his own spirit hypothesis to his hypothesis of the right political request in his nation. At last, individual assessment of the hypothesis
Essay.com/”The information that Plato considers in his conventional hypothesis isn’t the sort of information expected to run the city.
“The sort of information that Plato considered in his conventional hypothesis isn’t the sort of information expected to govern the city.”
The hypothesis of Plato’s spirit set of three is the hypothesis of brain that Plato, an antiquated Greek scholar supported for his postulation “Republic”, and is additionally the tank of the Fidelas tank. In the Republic, Plato demands that Ψυχή (thought) is comprised of three sections: Logistik, Logic), Tumidé, Spirit. These three sections additionally relate to three classifications of society. Regardless of whether it is a city or an individual, δικαιοσύνη (dikaiosyne, equity) is announced as a state where each part satisfies its capacity without meddling with others’ capacities. The capacity of making and pleasing happiness. The capacity of λογιστικός is to tenderly control the adoration for learning. The capacity of θυμοειδές is to follow the course of λογιστικός, seriously shielding the entire from interruptions and inward deterrents.
Question of test paper? Clarify Plato’s socialist arrangement in the Republic. As per Plato, which course ought to embrace this way of life? What is the explanation behind Plato asserting Communism? Basic judgment of Plato’s socialism. PHL 107 | Exam 2 Study Guide | Page 4 (1) Please quickly clarify Plato’s tale about the cavern. (2) Next, (a) the philosophical lord in Plato’s perfect world, (b) the qualification between Plato’s popular supposition and genuine information (shrewdness), and (c) Plato’s rationale, Whether it is communicated in. Position predominant thinker – lord. (1) What is Plato’s double transcendentalism? (2) How is this transcendentalism communicated in the cavern tales? (3) How is this identified with his situation on humankind? (1) What is the assessment of Plato’s majority rules system (2) What is this identified with his hypothesis of equity?