Within the Discussion Board area, write 500700 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas.
The key difference between previous university degrees you received and obtaining a doctorate is the requirement to produce a dissertation grounded in your own original research. Research is the foundation of this program and a key element of the roles and responsibilities of a scholar-practitioner.
Discuss the following:
Elaborate your own position on what it means to conduct original research.
Formulate an argument on why the research process is important.
Compose a definition of critical thinking, and cite a source.
Propose how critical thinking might change your doctoral writing from your previous writing style .
The transition from previous university degrees to doctoral studies is marked by a fundamental shift in the nature of academic engagement. While undergraduate and master’s programs primarily focus on knowledge acquisition and application, the doctorate culminates in the production of original research encapsulated in a dissertation. This distinction underscores the doctoral degree’s role in cultivating independent, critical thinkers capable of contributing novel insights to their field.
Original research is the bedrock of doctoral studies. It entails exploring uncharted territories of knowledge, asking new questions, and generating fresh perspectives. It is not merely a compilation of existing information but a systematic investigation that creates new understanding. While previous degrees might have involved research components, the doctoral dissertation demands a much deeper level of inquiry, requiring the researcher to formulate a unique research question, design a rigorous methodology, and contribute substantially to the existing body of knowledge.
The research process is more than a mere methodological exercise; it is a transformative intellectual journey. It cultivates a mindset of inquiry, skepticism, and intellectual curiosity. By engaging in the research process, doctoral students develop a profound understanding of their field, identify knowledge gaps, and refine their ability to critically evaluate information. Moreover, the research process fosters the development of essential skills such as problem-solving, data analysis, and effective communication.
Critical thinking, as defined by Paul and Elder (2006), is the intellectually disciplined process of actively and skillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and/or evaluating information gathered from, or generated by, observation, experience, reflection, reasoning, or communication, as a guide to belief and action. It is the cornerstone of scholarly inquiry.
In the context of doctoral writing, critical thinking is paramount. It enables researchers to question assumptions, evaluate evidence, and construct sound arguments. By adopting a critical lens, doctoral students can move beyond mere description and analysis to offer insightful interpretations and original contributions. Critical thinking transforms writing from a passive exercise of conveying information to an active process of engaging with ideas and constructing knowledge.
The shift from previous writing styles to doctoral writing is often marked by a heightened emphasis on clarity, precision, and argumentation. Critical thinking plays a pivotal role in this transformation. Instead of simply presenting information, doctoral writing demands the construction of a coherent and persuasive argument supported by robust evidence. By developing the ability to think critically, doctoral students can refine their writing style to become more focused, analytical, and engaging.
In conclusion, original research and critical thinking are inextricably linked in the doctoral journey. By engaging in rigorous research and cultivating a critical mindset, doctoral students position themselves to become independent scholars capable of making significant contributions to their field.
Reference: Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2006). The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking: Concepts and Tools. Foundation for Critical Thinking.