The leadership of GTR is considering AWS

 

 

The leadership of GTR is considering AWS for their enterprise cloud solution, but some members of the leadership team are skeptical of this solution. They have asked you, as a solution architect, to provide them with a report describing the advantages and disadvantages of the AWS. Based on what you learned in the materials this week and any personal experience with the solution, answer the following:

Create a 2- to 3-page evaluation report of the AWS cloud solutions, including:

Explain the reasons for switching to cloud architecture from on-premises, in general.
Explain what it means to design resilient architectures.
Describe the purpose of AWS.
Describe how AWS helps design resilient architectures.
Describe at least two advantages of using AWS*.
Describe at least two disadvantages of AWS*.

Sample Solution

Business and IT leaders all over the world are replacing legacy, on-premises technology with flexible, scalable, and cost-effective computing power in the cloud. From reducing IT costs to accelerating innovation, there are many compelling reasons to embark on a cloud migration journey: eliminate end-of-life concerns, consolidate data centers, and accelerate growth. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is a comprehensive, evolving cloud computing platform provided by Amazon. There is basically no IT-based need that your business has, that AWS cannot handle. Even better, you can expand or grow as you wish, without worrying about service disruption. This unlimited capacity is why AWS rules the cloud computing space.

the individuals who don’t commit their opportunity to shielding creatures, caring alone isn’t adequate when we think about the bull’s destiny. Eventually the bull will pass on a ridiculous and delayed demise, in a boisterous bullring with individuals cheering, booing, applauding and a bullfighter puncturing cutting edges into its back. For the majority, the occasions of the bullfight offset the consideration the bull might get ahead of time. An inquiry that one could present is, might a human want to imagine the bull’s perspective? On the off chance that the consideration it gets can be utilized as a support and guard of compassionate treatment, why should an individual be reluctant to go through a similar destiny?

Once more – utilizing the case of people – really focusing on a youthful human as it grows up to guarantee it carries on with the most ideal life is normal. It isn’t finished with a ulterior intention that prompts an organized killing saw by hundreds or thousands of individuals. Basic entitlements activists accept the equivalent ought to be applied to creatures and for this situation bulls. This is a comparative contention utilized by Peter Singer in what he characterizes as equivalent thought of interests. This is the idea that affliction and agony shouldn’t rely upon “the species that encounters it”. All things considered, indistinguishable interests ought to be given equivalent weight, paying little heed to species. Utilizing this thinking, bullfighting couldn’t be considered moral or on the grounds that the bull experiences in a manner that wouldn’t be acknowledged whether it were a person.

During the 1970s Richard D Ryder authored the term speciesism, characterized in the OED as, “the supposition of human prevalence driving over the abuse of creatures”. Peter Singer likewise involved this term in his 1975 book, Animal Liberation, anticipating that later on people will glance back at their treatment of non-human creatures similarly that we today view the despicable and treacherous treatment of Africans utilized as slaves. Involving this contention for bullfighting in Spain, someone could contend that this will likewise be the situation with bullfighting. Later on, Spaniards could glance back, at a once conventional blood sport, with sensations of disgrace and responsibility.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.