The Lottery

 

The beginning of the story tells us that in some towns, there were so many people that it took two days to complete the lottery. However, in this village we are reading about, it was small enough that the lottery could be done in less than two hours. Why do you think this might be significant?
How realistic do you feel this story “The Lottery” is? Do we take it that the author wants us to believe a lottery like this actually happens every year, or do you think the author means for this story to be more symbolic? That is, maybe the author means for this story to stand for something else or even teach us a lesson.
If you believe the story is symbolic or not meant to be taken literally, what message or lesson do you believe the author is conveying? (There is no one right answer here. Readers have questioned this story and tried to interpret its ending, but the author refused to give an interpretation “leaving readers to decide for themselves).
To help interpret some meaning from “The Lottery” and to figure out what the story may be symbolic of, a good place to start is looking at the publication date. Even though the story seems to take place in a much earlier time, the fact that it was published in 1948 might help with finding some meaning. What was taking place historically, socially and culturally during the time this story was published that might help determine its meaning?

Sample Solution

The morning of June 27th was clear and sunny, with the crisp warmth of a summer day; the flowers were in full bloom, and the grass was lush and green. The villagers began to gather in the square, between the post office and the bank, around ten o’clock; in some towns, the lottery took two days and had to be started on June 26th, but in this village, where there were only about three hundred people, the entire lottery took only about two hours, allowing it to begin at ten o’clock in the morning and still be completed in time for the villagers to get home for noon dinner.

s of the people involved in the organization, Lush does an excellent job of creating an environment for employee satisfaction. Consequently, customers tend to have high regard for in-store experiences. Furthermore, the Lush company’s motto is “Happy People, Happy Soap” (Lush, 2018). As a result, the organization has built all of their operations and goals around the idea of both being happy and improving the lives of others around them. The organization most definitely has developed the commitment and satisfaction of employees into a core competency. Furthermore, a lower turnover rate allows the organization to better develop employees, save money on recruitment costs, and improve customer satisfaction (Zuber, 1997).

Understanding the Lush SWOT Analysis

In terms of a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats analysis (SWOT) (Figure 1), Lush appears to be in a both complex and opportunistic position. Some noted strengths the organization has includes products, brand ambassadors, sustainability, and its handmade concept (Lush, 2018), (Saltzman, 2018). Weaknesses impacting the Lush company includes high retailing costs and low sale volumes (Trotter, 2017). Opportunities for the brand are the growing organic movement and fear of harmful chemicals in products (Lush, 2018). Growing threats to the organization are competition and brand loyalty (Loeb, 2017). All of these factors will definitely play a role in the development of the Lush company in the near future.

The Lush company’s strengths of products, brand ambassadors, sustainability, and handmade products most definitely have placed it in a leadership position in the industry. To begin, Lush’s products offered are unlike any other in the industry (Jones & Manktelow, 2017). As a result, there is no direct competition in terms of product alternatives. Another strength the organization has is its vast numbers of brand ambassadors through organic marketing. Because of their strong orientation to social media and use of younger individuals in terms of advertising, they have successfully grown their market share while spending nothing on advertising (Jones & Manktelow, 2017). Estée Lauder, one of Lush’s competitors, spent 965 million USD on advertising in 2017 (Statistica, 2018). As a result, Lush has quite the comparative advantage in terms of advertising costs resulting from organic marketing. Sustainability is a growing concern for younger generations. Specifically, as generation Z begins to get more involved in the consumer space, they are beginning to ask more of businesses in terms of sustainable operations (Sulima, 2018). Lush is doing an excellent job of taking advantage throu

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.