The most important leadership characteristics

 

Identify and explain the most important leadership characteristics that support an environment of innovation. Connect them to stages 3 & 4 of the Kotter’s change model

Sample Solution

The most important leadership characteristics

In the rapidly changing world today, it is crucial for organizations to be innovative in order to stay competitive in the market and ensure continued success. This need for innovation has brought on a requirement for leaders who are capable of influencing and inspiring creative efforts. Without innovation leadership, it is difficult for modern organizations to survive in the dynamic marketplace. Key characteristics of innovation leadership include: risk tolerance, domain expertise, openness, low anxiety, emotional stability, confidence, and action oriented.  Innovation is synonymous with creativity. And free-flowing creativity involves a great deal of risk. An innovation leader has high risk tolerance, and has the uncanny knack to consider all possible eventualities to make well-calculated bets that often pay off.

scorn for the entrepreneur society of which he was encircled in is seen plainly in his Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts written in 1844. These emphasis on the issue of distanced work of which overwhelms the early industrialist society he lives in. For Marx, the connection among distance and private enterprise is inborn because of the ‘double-dealing and shamefulness’ inside the benefit fuelled construction of free enterprise (Pappenheim, 1967: 81). It is essential to take note of that the two specialists and business people are distanced inside an industrialist framework however for this article, the spotlight will exclusively be on estranged work. Marx parts this estrangement into ‘four moderate deteriorating faculties’ (Dale, 2016: 91) which this paper will diagram prior to surveying the degree that this idea is completely connected to free enterprise or regardless of whether it is available in all of human existence. It will then, at that point, contend that the connection among estrangement and private enterprise can be subverted by Marx’s problematic evaluation of distance and asses the level that his contentions can be esteemed today.

Prior to assessing the connections among free enterprise and estrangement, one should see the value in that the premise of Marx’s speculations are on the Industrial Revolution more than a century prior. In this manner, Marx can work on the industrialist design of society into the bourgeoisie – who own the method for creation and capital delivered – and the low class – who are the work constrained and can be named as the work here. For Marx, work should be a ‘utilization esteem’, in that it ought to be delivered to fulfill man’s necessities (McLellan, 1978). This is clear in his composition: ‘From each as indicated by his capacity. To each as per his requirements.’ (Marx refered to in Conly, 1978: 90) which can be streamlined into one should make as much as possible and should create. All things being equal, in an entrepreneur society, work turns into a ware claimed and constrained by bourgeoisie in this manner eliminating the human instinct present in natural creation and making the ‘generalization of work’ (Marx, 1844 refered to in McLellan, 1978: 78). This idea of how the worker is isolated from the result of work is the principal type of estrangement that will be talked about. As the specialist put exertion and abilities into his items as ‘is essential and general part of human existence’ (Ritzer, 2000: 60), he becomes estranged from his capital as he has no control or responsibility for. Ins

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.