The new Secretary of Homeland Security

assume you are the new Secretary of Homeland Security. You are drafting a Policy Document referred to as a “White Paper” for the Biden Administration to highlight the impact of open/closed borders in the age of COVID-19 on migration, asylum seekers, and economic recovery. In this white paper, consider the following to frame your paper.

Define what YOU believe an “OPEN” vs “CLOSED” border means especially when dealing with those seeking asylum. Reminder that you can provide your opinion without using “I think” or something similar.
How do you believe illegal migrants can be treated humanely and with dignity/inclusion?
How does an “open” vs a “closed” border impact the United States economy?
What are your recommendations for the next 12-24 months on specific steps that the new administration needs to take?

 

 

 

Sample Solution

When it comes to borders, the terms “open” and “closed” have traditionally been used to refer to the amount of access a certain country or region is willing to give foreign nationals. Generally speaking, an open border is one that has fewer restrictions on people entering or leaving its boundaries while a closed border has strict regulations concerning who can enter and leave the area (Moe, 2017). However, in times of crisis such as this pandemic, these definitions become less clear cut due to additional factors that must be taken into account when considering their implications on migration, asylum seekers and economic recovery.

For instance, an open border during this time could mean allowing essential personnel and goods into a country without any quarantine restrictions. This policy could help stimulate local economies by ensuring vital supplies can still enter despite current travel bans (Sampson et al., 2020). It would also provide more flexibility for those seeking asylum from war-torn countries or individuals who need medical attention but are unable to receive it where they currently reside (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees [UNHCR], 2021). On the other hand though, allowing asylum seekers unrestricted access with no screening process whatsoever would likely put burden on both public health resources as well as national security agencies if ill-intentioned actors were able to slip past unnoticed.

Thus based on these considerations I believe that an effective policy should strive towards striking a balance between keeping borders open enough so that essential travelers can still move freely while simultaneously tightening protocols around non-essential visitors like tourists or vacationers who may only add further strain onto already overburdened healthcare systems (Cooper et al., 2020). Still maintaining some form of restriction even at ‘open’ borders helps protect both citizens of our nation as well as foreigners seeking refuge from hardship abroad.

In conclusion then, it is important for us all remember when discussing the impact of open versus closed borders during this trying time that there is no easy answer here; instead we must look towards forging policies which prioritize public safety while also taking into account humanitarian concerns so that those most vulnerable amongst us do not suffer unnecessarily during these difficult times.

Delimitation Nurses to be studied are available because of the scientist’s broad organization of contacts in Missouri. The members have email accounts, which will give admittance to support in the poll. One more delimiting factor is the accessibility of the designated research gathering to partake in a web-based study.

Research in the scholarly world is being moved from paper and pencil to online overviews. Welcoming populace portions to visit a site for the motivations behind finishing a poll is considerably more open and helpful for members, in this way giving the scientist more prominent admittance to members and a more significant level of support achievement.

Considering that the populace to be reviewed for this examination has been the focal point of many investigations, the information gathered will give new bits of knowledge to decide the indicators of understudy outcome in nursing programs.

Review of Literature Nursing Curricula in the United States Research on nursing educational plans in the United states had confirmed that the country’s nursing deficiency was serious that momentum enlisted medical caretakers couldn’t be viewed as a solid labor force asset later on, and that nursing curricular substance should have been addressed to meet medical care necessities by Year 2020.

Accessible information proposed that simply 25% to half of the attendants who moved on from nursing schools would go on in their vocations following five years in the calling. Notwithstanding the anticipated lack of around 800,000 medical caretakers, or 29%, by 2020, a Health Affairs report in 2007 anticipated the deficiency of attendants to be 340,000 by 2020. The modified report actually showed that the projected nursing lack would be multiple times bigger than the size of the deficiency when it was at its top in 2001. Staff deficiencies joined with a lacking stock of new medical attendants with the certifications to show in scholarly settings have prompted expectations of more noteworthy deficiencies.

Confidential area enlistment from the generally restricted pool of qualified employees further convoluted the issue. The need to recognize components that would draw in and hold qualified medical caretakers as staff was pressing. Alluring components could incorporate instructive program improvement, personnel preparing, more significant compensations, advance reimbursement programs, or different motivating forces. By and large, nursing schools had been extremely organized in nature, yet the substance in medical care training kept on extending, requiring huge examination and changes in educational programs (Pike, 2002).

A concentrate by Lasater and Nielsen, upheld that the customary clinical instruction model of all out persistent consideration was turning into at this point not sufficient. It had become occupant after nursing instructors to not just work with the improvement of understudy abilities and capacities to foster definite consideration plans, yet to make nursing pioneers who accepted that individuals matter, and to foster aversion to the necessities of others.

The pioneers would should have the option to work with groups to extricate from everyday tensions consolation for change, have the readiness to have an effect, and become basic and fruitful parts in the execution of progress. As indicated by a study, assessment pioneers saw medical caretakers as one of the most trusted of wellbeing data sources, however noticed that they coming up short on brought together voice and showed a failure to zero in on key wellbeing strategy issues.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.