The norm for all students across the country

 

Scenario:
Michael has been referred for special education services after teachers and his parents had tried several problem-solving efforts within his current school
and classroom to help meet his educational needs. Results from Michael’s full case study evaluation suggest that he possesses behaviors consistent with
an emotional disability and requires special education services for more than 50% of his school day in order to help meet his educational needs. Michael’s
Individual Education Program (IEP) team decides that he requires a therapeutic day placement in order to meet his educational needs. An administrator
within Michael’s home school district states that the school district does not offer a therapeutic day placement option for students and Michael must attend
a placement outside of the county. This placement will cost over $7,000 per month, but the school has stated they can only pay $4,000 per month for an out
of district therapeutic day placement. If you search out costs for this type of service you will find it is on the low end for a halftime placement. The school
explains Michael is a new student this year and the cost was not budgeted for; the school district claims they simply do not have the money. To make this
assignment more personable, the setting for this is in either the school district you currently live in or your childhood school district. In just two or three
sentences, look up your school budget and let me know how Michael would fare in our district.
Cite dollars and what you believe the outcome of this would be in your own district- and is this the norm for all students across the country?
Based on what you have learned about FAPE, explain why or why not the cost-sharing for the parents is an acceptable solution for Michael.
In the first sentence- Writer must start saying “yes this is acceptable” or “no this is not acceptable”. Use the rest of the paper to support your point.
You may then comment on the placement outside the county if you wish. To make this more personable, search out your local school district’s budget and
see how if Michael was a student in your district, how he would fare. Would they be covered? NO fence riding- one or the other.

 

 

Sample Solution

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pieces of data that can be put away in prompt (present moment) memory, how much data inside every one of those lumps can be very high, without unfavorably influencing the review of similar number

This question has been answered.

Get Answer