Sample Solution

Pros:
Outboard Toilet Placement – This placement would be the simplest solution, since it requires minimal installation and no changes to existing infrastructure. It also offers maximum flexibility in terms of configuring plumbing lines or other necessary connections. Additionally, this strategy could reduce labor costs by eliminating the need for plumbing modifications.

Inboard Toilet Placement – Installing an inboard toilet would create a more cohesive look with the existing bathroom layout, creating a cleaner aesthetic. It can also increase usable space in small bathrooms as it does not require additional floor area. Furthermore, if there are any issues with leaking or clogged toilets, it may be easier to repair them from this position due to improved access.

Same-handed Toilet Placement – This type of placement provides an efficient toilet flushing system that is easier to maintain than other strategies because all water lines are on one side of the tank rather than split between two sides. As a result, repairs or maintenance can often be done without having to move furniture or fixtures out of the way.

Nested Toilet Placement – This strategy takes up less space than other options while still maintaining proper piping requirements and providing adequate clearance around the tank and bowl components. Additionally, since pipes fit inside each other it eliminates potential leak points where they meet at bends which helps prevent future damage to walls and floors due to moisture accumulation (McDonald et al., 2019).

Cons:
Outboard Toilet Placement – The main downside of this approach is that it requires additional expenses for new pipes if existing ones cannot reach the desired location (McDonald et al., 2019). Additionally, finding enough open floor space for such a configuration may pose difficulties in smaller bathrooms that lack enough room for these additional parts before making contact with walls or furniture items already present in the room (Lambert & Southard 2017).

Inboard Toilet Placement – Potentially needing more complex installation processes could make this option much slower than those previously mentioned. Also requiring longer plumbing runs can be more expensive due to increased material costs for extra lengths of pipe needed compared with shorter runs (McDonald et al., 2019).

Same-handed Toilet Placement – Connecting all water lines on one side may limit design possibilities when attempting different configurations within cramped spaces as obstructions like cabinets have limited clearance away from wall boundaries (Lambert & Southard 2017). Moreover, while fewer leak points exist using this method compared with others; incorrect installation practices still leave room for errors which could result in costly damages down the line (Hills 2018).

Nested Toilet Placement – Constructing nested pipes involves cutting larger holes into walls compared with standard installations which increases risk levels associated with possible misalignments during assembly leading having negative impact on aesthetics resulting from exposed surfaces behind finished materials used later on during renovations process(Hills 2018). Moreover, because nested toilets utilize straight piping instead of traditional curves, regular inspection schedule should be implemented so sediment buildup does not become an issue over time due to excessive pressure exerted onto joints connecting pieces together .