The personal and/or communal ethical factors that may be involved in determining the moral position

 

1. What are the personal and/or communal ethical factors that may be involved in determining the moral position of either side in that debate? 2. Next, articulate and then evaluate the ethical positions using Kantian ethics (that is, the categorical imperative) relative to the long standing debate (that is your topic chosen in the week three assignment). 3. Finally, create a complete annotated bibliography for 5 ac​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​ademic scholarly sources. You will annotate each source. The sources should be relevant to your topic chosen in the week three assignment. Include the following: Publication details Annotation (a detailed reading of the source) Each annotation section should include the following: 1. Summarize key points and identify key terms (using quotation marks, and citing a page in parentheses). 2. Describe the controversies or “problems” raised by the articles. State whether you agree or disagree and give reasons. Locate one or two quotations to be used in the final research project. 3. Evaluate the ways in which this article is important and has helped you focus your understanding​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​.

Sample Solution

mbryos.” His basis for this seeming contradiction is that animals are sentient and can suffer, where the embryo is not yet sentient and cannot suffer. Needless to say, this has many people up in arms, as does his stance on abortion. He is pro-choice, based on the argument that the fetus is non-sentient and incapable of suffering for much of its development. (answers.com)

Suffering is of great concern to Singer and the capacity for suffering and/or enjoyment and happiness is a vital part of his primary philosophy, which is the utilitarian calculation of preferences based on an equal consideration of interests. This is not to say that all interests are equal or that “trivial desires and pleasures” qualify as “interests.” He does not believe that one’s own interests are any more important than someone else’s, but that all comparable interests in any given situation should be evaluated and action taken based on the principle of maximizing the interests of those affected. This comes into play in his argument in support of abortion – the mother’s interests hold greater weight since she is able to suffer and/or be happy and the fetus is not. Consequently, the fetus does not really have “interests” and therefore should not be given equal preference or consideration. (answers.com)

Part II

My Personal Philosophy and How It Relates to Wollstonecraft, Nussbaum and Singer

Let’s start with the basics: I believe there is one Higher Power (let’s just say God, it’s shorter) and many paths to understanding God (as much as any mortal can). Spirituality is the foundation of my life and the source of all the things in my life that truly matter. Spirituality is the heart of God. But what is Spirituality? To me it is an overarching, underlying something… a light meant to illuminate even the darkest corners of our souls. [Yes, I believe that we have souls, that these souls are eternal and that they may or may not manifest in multiple lives over the course of the ages in order to advance an understanding of Spirituality, either in themselves, or in the world at large.] Spirituality to me is a striving to be my best, to connect – with others, with my own highest potential, and with God – in a significant and meaningful way, and to promote the spreading of Light in the world. Wha

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.